Assisted Suicide in Switzerland: Clarifying Liberties and Claims

Bioethics 30 (9) (2016)

Authors
Abstract
Assisting suicide is legal in Switzerland if it is offered without selfish motive to a person with decision-making capacity. Although the ‘Swiss model’ for suicide assistance has been extensively described in the literature, the formally and informally protected liberties and claims of assistors and recipients of suicide assistance in Switzerland are incompletely captured in the literature. In this article, we describe the package of rights involved in the ‘Swiss model’ using the framework of Hohfeldian rights as modified by Wenar. After outlining this framework, we dissect the rights involved in suicide assistance in Switzerland, and compare it with the situation in England and Germany. Based on this approach, we conclude that in Switzerland, claim rights exist for those requesting suicide assistance, and for those who are considering providing such assistance, even though no entitlements exist toward suicide assistance. We then describe the implementation of the ‘Swiss model’ and difficulties arising within it. Clarifying these issues is important to understand the Swiss situation, to evaluate what features of it may or may not be worth correcting or emulating, and to understand how it can impact requests for suicide assistance in other countries due to ‘suicide tourism’. It is also important to understand exactly what sets Switzerland apart from other countries with different legislations regarding suicide assistance.
Keywords Switzerland  assisted suicide  patient rights  end of life care
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/bioe.12304
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 41,608
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Postscript to Gross V Switzerland.Isra Black - 2014 - Medical Law Review 22 (4):656.
The Suicide Tourist Trap: Compromise Across Boundaries. [REVIEW]Richard Huxtable - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):327-336.
The Case for Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide.Robin Gibson - 2013 - The Australian Humanist 109 (109):11.
What Does a `Right' to Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS) Legally Entail?M. T. Harvey - 2002 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (4-5):271-286.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-10-22

Total views
8 ( #798,897 of 2,249,273 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #388,681 of 2,249,273 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature