On Audi's Marriage of Ross and Kant

In Mark Timmons, John Greco & Alfred R. Mele (eds.), Rationality and the Good: Critical Essays on the Ethics and Epistemology of Robert Audi. Oxford University Press. pp. 64-72 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


As its title suggests, Robert Audi’s The Good in the Right1 defends an intuitionist moral view like W.D. Ross’s in The Right and the Good. Ross was an intuitionist, first, in metaethics, where he held that there are self-evident moral truths that can be known by intuition. But he was also an intuitionist in the different sense used in normative ethics, since he held that there are irreducibly many such truths. Some concern the intrinsic goods, which are in turn plural, so there are prima facie duties to promote pleasure, knowledge, virtue, and just distributions. But others are deontological, requiring one apart from any consequences to keep promises, not lie, make reparations, express gratitude, and not injure others. Audi embraces both these intuitionist views, but in each case with an important addition. Ross sometimes said that if a proposition does not need proof, it is incapable of proof, or cannot be justified inferentially. Audi argues persuasively that this is not so. A proposition that is selfevident, in the sense that understanding it justifies one in believing it, can also be derivable from other self-evident propositions in a way that increases its justification. And he exploits this possibility in his normative ethics. Whereas Ross held that his prima facie duties are underivative, Audi suggests that, while self-evident, they can also be grounded in a more abstract principle. More specifically, he argues in Chapter 4 of his book that they can be grounded in Kant’s categorical imperative, which he applies primarily in its second, or formula of humanity, version. The result is to transform what Audi calls Rossian intuitionism into Kantian 1 intuitionism, where specific duties about promoting pleasure and keeping promises derive from a more fundamental requirement to respect rational personhood. I will not challenge Audi’s version of metaethical intuitionism, which I think is the most subtle and persuasive yet given. Nor will I question his normative starting-point in Ross’s theory of prima facie duties, which I find unimpeachable..



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 84,292

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Prima facie and seeming duties.Michael Morreau - 1996 - Studia Logica 57 (1):47 - 71.
Some remarks on Robert Audi's the good in the right.Candace Vogler - forthcoming - In Mark Timmons (ed.), Rationality and the Good. Oxford University Press.
Moderate intuitionism and the epistemology of moral judgment.Robert Audi - 1998 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (1):15-44.
A Kantian intuitionism.Robert Audi - 2001 - Mind 110 (439):601-635.
The Good in the Right. [REVIEW]Anthony Skelton - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):305-325.
Renewing Moral Intuitionism.Elizabeth Tropman - 2009 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (4):440-463.
Moral value and human diversity.Robert Audi - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Telling it like it is: Philosophy as Descriptive Manifestation.Mark T. Nelson - 2005 - American Philosophical Quarterly 42 (3):2005.
A Partial Application Procedure for Ross’s Ethical Theory.B. C. Postow - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Research 31:239-248.
Challenges to Audi's ethical intuitionism.Klemens Kappel - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):391-413.


Added to PP

74 (#183,036)

6 months
1 (#510,180)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Hurka
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

Workplace Civility: A Confucian Approach.Tae Wan Kim & Alan Strudler - 2012 - Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (3):557-577.
Workplace Civility: A Confucian Approach.Tae Wan Kim & Alan Strudler - 2012 - Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (3):557-577.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references