The Demise of Compatibilism?

Authors
Abstract
This paper suggests that the arguments for compatibilism are invalid because they use incompatible definitions of causal determinism and free will, an illegitimate definition of free will, and a logical fallacy concerning free will and morality.
Keywords Compatibilism  Determinism  Freewillism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,373
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Revisionist Turn: A Brief History of Recent Work on Free Will.Manuel Vargas - 2010 - In Jesus Aguilar, Andrei Buckareff & Keith Frankish (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Action. Palgrave.
Compatibilism: The Argument From Shallowness.Saul Smilansky - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 115 (3):257-82.
Compatibilism Again.D. B. Hausman - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (March):509-514.
Compatibilism.Richard Foley - 1978 - Kind 87 (July):421-28.
Humean Compatibilism.Helen Beebee & Alfred R. Mele - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):201-223.
Challenges for Compatibilism.K. Machina - 1994 - American Philosophical Quarterly 31 (3):213-22.
Is Hard Determinism a Form of Compatibilism?Jeremy Randel Koons - 2002 - Philosophical Forum 33 (1):81-99.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-06-18

Total downloads
70 ( #89,160 of 2,266,821 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #372,716 of 2,266,821 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature