In Brian Leiter & Neil Sinhababu (eds.), Nietzsche and Morality. Oxford University Press (2007)
There is a widespread, popular view—and one I basically endorse—that Nietzsche is, in one sense of the word, a nihilist. As Arthur Danto put it some time ago, according to Nietzsche, “there is nothing in [the world] which might sensibly be supposed to have value.” As interpreters of Nietzsche, though, we cannot simply stop here. Nietzsche's higher men, Übermenschen, “genuine philosophers”, free spirits—the types Nietzsche wants to bring forth from the human, all-too-human herds he sees around him with the fish hooks, as he says, of his books—seem to engage in what looks like valuing. These free spirits are supposed to revalue the old values—revaluing, as is clear from the texts, is not simply to remove the old values from circulation (Nietzsche uses “umwerten” and not “entwerten”)—and they are supposed to create new values. And, of course, Nietzsche himself, free spirit that he is, takes on the task of revaluing all values and seems to assert many a strident evaluation. So we need to say more here. What are Nietzsche and his free spirits up to when they engage in what looks, for all the world, like a practice of valuing? What is the practice of valuing Nietzsche is recommending for his free spirits? I argue for two claims: (i) First, we end up facing an interpretive puzzle when we attempt to explain how Nietzsche's free spirits are supposed to engage in a practice of valuing. (ii) Second, we can solve the interpretive puzzle by taking Nietzsche's free spirits to be engaged in a fictionalist simulacrum of valuing.
|Keywords||Nietzsche meta-ethics metaethics illusion fictionalism pretense pretence values value subjectivism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Nietzsche on the Diachronic Will and the Problem of Morality.Alessandra Tanesini - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):652-675.
Debunking Arguments and the Genealogy of Religion and Morality.Kelby Mason - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (9):770-778.
Nietzsche's Meta-Axiology: Against the Sceptical Readings.Andrew Huddleston - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (2):322-342.
Similar books and articles
Free Will: The Positive Role of Illusion.Saul Smilansky - 1999 - In The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. Bowling Green: Philosophy Doc Ctr. pp. 143-152.
Review of Jonathan R. Cohen, Science, Culture, and Free Spirits: A Study of Nietzsche's Human, All-Too-Human. [REVIEW]Julian Young - 2010 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (7).
Tragedy and the Free Spirits: On Nietzsche's Theory of Aesthetic Freedom.Christoph Menke & James Swindal - 1996 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (1):1-12.
Free Will, Fundamental Dualism,and the Centrality of Illusion.Saul Smilansky - 2002 - In Robert H. Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. Oxford University Press. pp. 489-505.
Human, All Too Human: A Book for Free Spirits.Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche - 1984 - University of Nebraska Press.
Free Will: From Nature to Illusion.Saul Smilansky - 2001 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (1):71-95.
Free Spirits and Free Thinkers : Nietzsche and Guyau on the Future of Morality.Keith Ansell-Pearson - 2009 - In Jeffrey A. Metzger (ed.), Nietzsche, Nihilism, and the Philosophy of the Future. Continuum.
Eternal Recurrence and Nihilism: Adding Weight to the Unbearable Lightness of Action.Nadeem J. Z. Hussain - manuscript
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads721 ( #1,484 of 2,172,701 )
Recent downloads (6 months)91 ( #1,505 of 2,172,701 )
How can I increase my downloads?