Mistake of Law and Culpability

Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (2):135-159 (2010)
Abstract
When does a defendant not deserve punishment because he is unaware that his conduct breaches a penal statute? Retributivists must radically rethink their answer to this question to do justice to our moral intuitions. I suggest that modest progress on this topic can be made by modeling our approach to ignorance of law on our familiar approach to ignorance of fact. We need to distinguish different levels of culpability in given mistakes and to differentiate what such mistakes may be about. I discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this approach with special attention to how to contrast offenses from defenses. The alternative I tend to favor probably should not be implemented in existing penal codes. As a result, we are likely to remain dissatisfied with the decisions made by our criminal justice system about the exculpatory effect of ignorance of law.
Keywords Culpability  Retributivism  Desert  Ignorance of law  Consequentialism  Desert  Blame  Morality  Offenses and defenses
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11572-010-9092-7
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,590
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions.Keith DeRose - 1992 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (4):913-929.
The Responsibility of the Psychopath Revisited.Neil Levy - 2007 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 14 (2):pp. 129-138.
Skepticism About Moral Responsibility.Gideon Rosen - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):295–313.
Culpability and Ignorance.Gideon Rosen - 2002 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (1):61–84.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
You Got What You Deserved.Larry Alexander - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (2):309-319.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Philosophy of Criminal Law: Extending the Debates. [REVIEW]Douglas Husak - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (2):351-365.
Aquinas on Crime.Charles P. Nemeth - 2008 - St. Augustine's Press.
Intoxication and Culpability.Douglas Husak - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):363-379.
Excusing Mistakes of Law.Gideon Yaffe - 2009 - Philosophers' Imprint 9 (2):1-22.
Facts, Law, Exculpation, and Inculpation: Comments on Simons.Larry Alexander - 2009 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (3):241-245.
Why Criminal Law: A Question of Content? [REVIEW]Douglas Husak - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):99-122.
Punishment and Freedom.Alan Brudner - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Corporate Culpability and the Limits of Law.William S. Laufer - 1996 - Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (3):311-324.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-13

Total downloads

47 ( #110,738 of 2,168,630 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #346,836 of 2,168,630 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums