Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (2):135-159 (2010)
When does a defendant not deserve punishment because he is unaware that his conduct breaches a penal statute? Retributivists must radically rethink their answer to this question to do justice to our moral intuitions. I suggest that modest progress on this topic can be made by modeling our approach to ignorance of law on our familiar approach to ignorance of fact. We need to distinguish different levels of culpability in given mistakes and to differentiate what such mistakes may be about. I discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this approach with special attention to how to contrast offenses from defenses. The alternative I tend to favor probably should not be implemented in existing penal codes. As a result, we are likely to remain dissatisfied with the decisions made by our criminal justice system about the exculpatory effect of ignorance of law.
|Keywords||Culpability Retributivism Desert Ignorance of law Consequentialism Desert Blame Morality Offenses and defenses|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions.Keith DeRose - 1992 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (4):913-929.
The Responsibility of the Psychopath Revisited.Neil Levy - 2007 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 14 (2):pp. 129-138.
Skepticism About Moral Responsibility.Gideon Rosen - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):295–313.
Don't Know, Don't Kill: Moral Ignorance, Culpability, and Caution.Alexander A. Guerrero - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 136 (1):59-97.
Culpability and Ignorance.Gideon Rosen - 2002 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (1):61–84.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Justification, Rationality and Mistake: Mistake of Law is No Excuse? It Might Be a Justificaton!Re'em Segev - 2006 - Law and Philosophy 25 (1):31-79.
The Philosophy of Criminal Law: Extending the Debates. [REVIEW]Douglas Husak - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (2):351-365.
Criminal Culpability: The Possibility of a General Theory. [REVIEW]Jeremy Horder - 1993 - Law and Philosophy 12 (2):193 - 215.
An Economic Perspective on the Doctrine of Unilateral Mistake in English Contract Law: A Remedy-Based Approach.Qi Zhou - manuscript
Facts, Law, Exculpation, and Inculpation: Comments on Simons.Larry Alexander - 2009 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (3):241-245.
Why Criminal Law: A Question of Content? [REVIEW]Douglas Husak - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):99-122.
Corporate Culpability and the Limits of Law.William S. Laufer - 1996 - Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (3):311-324.
Law and its Presuppositions: Actions, Agents, and Rules.S. C. Coval - 1986 - Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Review of “Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law”. [REVIEW]David Dolinko - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (1):93-102.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads47 ( #110,738 of 2,168,630 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,836 of 2,168,630 )
How can I increase my downloads?