Interpretation 9 (3):T791-T807 (2021)
Abstract |
Time-lapse seismic analysis plays a vital role in reservoir management and reservoir simulation model updates. However, 4D seismic data are subject to interference and tuning effects. Being able to resolve and monitor thin reservoirs of different quality can aid in optimizing infill drilling or in locating bypassed hydrocarbons. Using 4D seismic data from the Maui field in the offshore Taranaki Basin of New Zealand, we generate typical seismic attributes sensitive to reservoir thickness and rock properties. We find that spectral instantaneous attributes extracted from time-lapse seismic data illuminate more detailed reservoir features compared with those same attributes computed on broadband seismic data. We have developed an unsupervised machine-learning workflow that enables us to combine eight spectral instantaneous seismic attributes into single classification volumes for the baseline and monitor surveys using self-organizing maps. Changes in the SOM natural clusters between the baseline and monitor surveys suggest production-related changes that are caused primarily by water replacing gas as the reservoir is being swept under a strong water drive. The classification volumes also facilitate monitoring water saturation changes within thin reservoirs as well as illuminating thin baffles. Thus, these SOM classification volumes indicate internal reservoir heterogeneity that can be incorporated into reservoir simulation models. Using meaningful SOM clusters, geobodies are generated for the baseline and monitor SOM classifications. The recoverable gas reserves for those geobodies are then computed and compared with production data. The SOM classifications of the Maui 4D seismic data seem to be sensitive to water saturation change and subtle pressure depletions due to gas production under a strong water drive.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1190/int-2020-0176.1 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Characterizing a Turbidite System in Canterbury Basin, New Zealand, Using Seismic Attributes and Distance-Preserving Self-Organizing Maps.Tao Zhao, Jing Zhang, Fangyu Li & Kurt J. Marfurt - 2016 - Interpretation: SEG 4 (1):SB79-SB89.
Coherence Attribute at Different Spectral Scales.Fangyu Li & Wenkai Lu - 2014 - Interpretation: SEG 2 (1):SA99-SA106.
Geologic Pattern Recognition From Seismic Attributes: Principal Component Analysis and Self-Organizing Maps.Rocky Roden, Thomas Smith & Deborah Sacrey - 2015 - Interpretation: SEG 3 (4):SAE59-SAE83.
Characterizing a Mississippian Tripolitic Chert Reservoir Using 3D Unsupervised and Supervised Multiattribute Seismic Facies Analysis: An Example From Osage County, Oklahoma.Atish Roy, Benjamin L. Dowdell & Kurt J. Marfurt - 2013 - Interpretation: SEG 1 (2):SB109-SB124.
Using Machine Learning as an Aid to Seismic Geomorphology, Which Attributes Are the Best Input?Lennon Infante-Paez & Kurt J. Marfurt - 2019 - Interpretation 7 (3):SE1-SE18.
View all 6 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Unsupervised Machine Learning Using 3D Seismic Data Applied to Reservoir Evaluation and Rock Type Identification.Marwa Hussein, Robert R. Stewart, Deborah Sacrey, Jonny Wu & Rajas Athale - 2021 - Interpretation 9 (2):T549-T568.
Machine Learning to Reduce Cycle Time for Time-Lapse Seismic Data Assimilation Into Reservoir Management.Yang Xue, Mariela Araujo, Jorge Lopez, Kanglin Wang & Gautam Kumar - 2019 - Interpretation 7 (3):SE123-SE130.
Which Seismic Attributes Are Best for Subtle Fault Detection?Marwa Hussein, Robert R. Stewart & Jonny Wu - 2021 - Interpretation 9 (2):T299-T314.
Integrating Time-Lapse Gravity, Production, and Geologic Structure Data in a Gas Reservoir Study.Andrea Balza & Yaoguo Li - 2020 - Interpretation 8 (4):SS129-SS143.
Fluvial Reservoir Architecture Interpretation Below the Seismic Resolution in an Offshore Oilfield.Dong Zhang, Xuri Huang, Ting’en Fan, Haifeng Wang, Feng Ding & Cheng Yin - 2021 - Interpretation 9 (3):T623-T635.
Amplitude Variation with Offset Analysis of Time-Lapse Land Seismic Data in a Gas Field, Thrace Basin, Turkey.Sait Baytok, Şeref Arzu Aktepe & Muhlis Ünaldi - 2016 - Interpretation: SEG 4 (4):T543-T556.
4D Seismic Interpretation in a Nigerian Deepwater Field.Oghogho Effiom, Robert Maskall, Edwin Quadt, Kazeem A. Lawal, Raphael Afolabi, Jake Emakpor & Reginald Mbah - 2015 - Interpretation: SEG 3 (2):SP11-SP19.
Prediction and Validation of Gas Hydrate Saturation Distribution in the Eastern Nankai Trough, Japan: Geostatistical Approach Integrating Well-Log and 3D Seismic Data.Machiko Tamaki, Kiyofumi Suzuki, Tetsuya Fujii & Akihiko Sato - 2016 - Interpretation: SEG 4 (1):SA83-SA94.
Multidisciplinary Analysis of Hydraulic Stimulation and Production Effects Within the Niobrara and Codell Reservoirs, Wattenberg Field, Colorado: Part 2 — Analysis of Hydraulic Fracturing and Production.Matthew Bray, Jakob Utley, Yanrui Ning, Angela Dang, Jacquelyn Daves, Isabel White, Ahmed Alfataierge, Erdinc Eker, Thomas Davis, Ali Tura & James Simmons - forthcoming - Interpretation:1-53.
Integrated Reservoir Characterization for Understanding in Situ Combustion Process in Balol Heavy Oil Field, India.Nimisha Vedanti, Sanjay Surya Yerramilli, Ramesh Chandra Yerramilli, Mrinal K. Sen, Ravi Prakash Srivastava & Uma Vadapalli - 2015 - Interpretation: SEG 3 (2):T69-T80.
Seismic Screening of Rock Stiffness and Fluid Softening Using Rock-Physics Attributes.Per Avseth & Tor Veggeland - 2015 - Interpretation: SEG 3 (4):SAE85-SAE93.
Novel Fracture Zone Identifier Attribute Using Geophysical and Well Log Data for Unconventional Reservoirs.Debotyam Maity & Fred Aminzadeh - 2015 - Interpretation: SEG 3 (3):T155-T167.
A Case History of Experimental Time-Lapse 3C 2D Seismic Reflection Data for Reservoir Monitoring at Cold Lake, Alberta, Canada. [REVIEW]J. Helen Isaac & Don C. Lawton - 2014 - Interpretation: SEG 2 (2):SE47-SE54.
Multidisciplinary Analysis of Hydraulic Stimulation and Production Effects Within the Niobrara and Codell Reservoirs, Wattenberg Field, Colorado — Part 1: Baseline Reservoir Conditions.Matthew Bray, Jacquelyn Daves, Daniel Brugioni, Asm Kamruzzaman, Tom Bratton, Sheila Harryandi, Alena Grechishnikova, Ali Tura, Thomas Davis & James Simmons - 2021 - Interpretation 9 (4):SG1-SG12.
Enhancement of Dynamic Reservoir Interpretation by Correlating Multiple 4D Seismic Monitors to Well Behavior.Zhen Yin, Milana Ayzenberg, Colin MacBeth, Tao Feng & Romain Chassagne - 2015 - Interpretation: SEG 3 (2):SP35-SP52.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2021-04-14
Total views
1 ( #1,539,311 of 2,498,942 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,180 of 2,498,942 )
2021-04-14
Total views
1 ( #1,539,311 of 2,498,942 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,180 of 2,498,942 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.