In Peter Wong, Sherah Bloor, Patrick Hutchings & Purushottama Bilimoria (eds.), Considering Religions, Rights and Bioethics: For Max Charlesworth. Springer Verlag. pp. 155-173 (2019)

Hume was wrong about getting an ‘ought’ out of an ‘is’: We do it all the time. The precaution which ‘authors do not commonly use’ is a relevant principle which we insert between mere is and axiological ought. Pamela in Richardson’s Pamela had one notable principle: qv. Kant’s later insistence that we ‘Act only on that maxim that you can at the same time will be an universal law’ sinks Hume.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-18148-2_12
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,842
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Hume's Principle Analytic?Crispin Wright - 2001 - In Bob Hale & Crispin Wright (eds.), Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. Oxford University Press. pp. 307-333.
Hume = Small Hume.Jeffrey Ketland - 2002 - Analysis 62 (1):92–93.
Hume's System of Space and Time.Angela Coventry - 2010 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 13.
Has Kant Answered Hume’s Causal Scepticism?Andrew Ward - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 14:193-198.
Hume´s Principle.João Paulo Gomes Monteiro - 1999 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 3 (2):165-186.
Hume´s Principle.João Paulo Gomes Monteiro - 1999 - Principia: Revista Internacional de Epistemologia 3 (2):165-185.
Hume’s Nominalism and the Copy Principle.Ruth Weintraub - 2012 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (S1):45-54.
An Examination of Kant's Second Analogy.Lori Nash - 1995 - Eidos: The Canadian Graduate Journal of Philosophy 12 (2):49-69.
Kant, Hume, and the Interruption of Dogmatic Slumber.Abraham Anderson - 2020 - New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
A Dilemma for Neo-Fregeanism.Robert Trueman - 2014 - Philosophia Mathematica 22 (3):361-379.


Added to PP index

Total views

Recent downloads (6 months)

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes