Natural theology: Wit, the electric shock, the aesthetic idea—and a belated acknowledgment of points made by the late MR Gershon Weiler
Sophia 42 (1):9-26 (2003)
The paper concludes the argument that certain aesthetic objects conduce to a feeling of radical contingency, and to an openness to St Thomas's Third Way proof for the existence of God. Much is conceded to the late Mr Gershon Weiler's criticism of an earlier discussion. The upshot is (a) that Necessary Being as converse of radical contingency may be an Aesthetic Idea/Sublime of Kant's kind, and (b) that without the ‘I AM that I am’, it is empty. The ‘inference’ from radical contingency to Necessary Being may function as George Eliot thought Wit to function, intellectually/aesthetically.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
What is the Philosophy of Nationalism?Gershon Weiler - 1994 - Studies in East European Thought 46 (1-2):119 - 128.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #374,755 of 2,164,552 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #347,995 of 2,164,552 )
How can I increase my downloads?