American Philosophical Quarterly 48 (2):129-145 (2011)

Authors
Daniel D. Hutto
University of Wollongong
Abstract
Concentrating on their treatment of folk psychology, this paper seeks to establish that, in the form advocated by its leading proponents, the Canberra project is presumptuous in certain key respects. Crucially, it presumes (1) that our everyday practices entail the existence of implicit folk theories; (2) that naturalists ought to be interested primarily in what such theories say; and (3) that the core content of such theories is adequately characterized by establishing what everyone finds intuitively obvious about the topics in question. I argue these presumptions are a bad starting point for any naturalistic project and, more specifically, that in framing things in this way proponents of the Canberra plan have led us unnecessarily into philosophical quagmires.
Keywords Theory Theory  Analytic Functionalism  Mental Causation
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,417
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Beliefs as Inner Causes: The (Lack of) Evidence.Devin Sanchez Curry - 2018 - Philosophical Psychology 31 (6):850-877.
Street Smarts.Devin Sanchez Curry - forthcoming - Synthese:1-20.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-07

Total views
1,037 ( #4,916 of 2,449,127 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #441,480 of 2,449,127 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes