Authors
Peter Hutcheson
Texas State University
Abstract
This argument defends Hempel's rejection of the converse-consequence condition and argues against Baruch Brody's attempt to revive "something like" it.
Keywords confirmation theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Confirmation and Adequacy Conditions.Marsha Hanen - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (3):361-368.
Constructival Plasticity.Ronald P. Endicott - 1994 - Philosophical Studies 74 (1):51-75.
Structural Rules for Abduction.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 2007 - Theoria 22 (3):325-329.
Conditions.Roger Wertheimer - 1968 - Journal of Philosophy 65 (12):355-364.
Deciding Regular Grammar Logics with Converse Through First-Order Logic.Stéphane Demri & Hans De Nivelle - 2005 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 14 (3):289-329.
Eliminating “Converse” From Converse PDL.Giuseppe De Giacomo - 1996 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 5 (2):193-208.
Eliminating “Converse” From Converse PDL.Giuseppe Giacomo - 1996 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 5 (2):193-208.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-02

Total views
77 ( #148,755 of 2,499,741 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #62,923 of 2,499,741 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes