Southwest Philosophical Studies 6 (1981)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
This argument defends Hempel's rejection of the converse-consequence condition and argues against Baruch Brody's attempt to revive "something like" it.
|
Keywords | confirmation theory |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Why the Converse Consequence Condition Cannot Be Accepted.Luca Moretti - 2003 - Analysis 63 (4):297–300.
The Converse Consequence Condition and Hempelian Qualitative Confirmation.Pierre Le Morvan - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):448-.
The Logical Vs. The Ontological Understanding of Conditions.Rögnvaldur Ingthorsson - 2008 - Metaphysica 9 (2):129-137.
Confirmation, Transitivity, and Moore: The Screening-Off Approach.William Roche & Tomoji Shogenji - 2013 - Philosophical Studies (3):1-21.
Converse Relations, Vectors, And Three Theses From Armstrong.Andrew Newman - 2002 - Metaphysica 3 (2).
Deciding Regular Grammar Logics with Converse Through First-Order Logic.Stéphane Demri & Hans De Nivelle - 2005 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 14 (3):289-329.
Eliminating “Converse” From Converse PDL.Giuseppe De Giacomo - 1996 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 5 (2):193-208.
Eliminating “Converse” From Converse PDL.Giuseppe Giacomo - 1996 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 5 (2):193-208.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-02-02
Total views
77 ( #148,755 of 2,499,741 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #62,923 of 2,499,741 )
2015-02-02
Total views
77 ( #148,755 of 2,499,741 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #62,923 of 2,499,741 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads