Microphysicalism , the view that whole objects behave the way they do in virtue of the behavior of their constituent parts, is an influential contemporary view with a long philosophical and scientific heritage. In What's Wrong With Microphysicalism? Andreas Huttemann offers a fresh challenge to this view. Huttemann agrees with the microphysicalists that we can explain compound systems by explaining their parts, but claims that this does not entail that the parts determine the whole. At most, it shows that there is a relationship of determination within parts and wholes, but there is no justification for taking this relationship to be asymmetrical rather than one of mutual dependence. Huttemann argues that if this is the case, then microphysicalists have no right to claim that the micro-level is the ultimate agent: neither the parts nor the whole have "ontological priority." Huttemann advocates a pragmatic pluralism, allowing for different ways to describe nature. In the course of his argument, Huttemann examines three compound theses of micro-physicalism: micro-determination (or "supervenience"), micro-government, and micro-causation. He uses examples from classical and quantum physics to illustrate various senses of micro-explanation, and discusses the likelihood of emergent phenomena or properties. He distinguishes between microphysicalism and other forms of physicalism, such as identity-physicalism, and argues that we can buy into the latter while rejecting microphysicalism. What's Wrong With Microphysicalism? is a convincing and original contribution to central issues in contemporary philosophy of mind, philosophy of science and metaphysics
|Keywords||Matter Constitution Matter Properties Physics Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$90.87 new (31% off) $97.00 used (26% off) $105.27 direct from Amazon (20% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||QC173.H87 2004|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Theory Reduction by Means of Functional Sub-Types.Michael Esfeld & Christian Sachse - 2007 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (1):1 – 17.
Better Best Systems – Too Good To Be True.Marius Backmann & Alexander Reutlinger - 2014 - Dialectica 68 (3):375-390.
Ontological Emergence: How is That Possible? Towards a New Relational Ontology.Gil C. Santos - 2015 - Foundations of Science 20 (4):429-446.
Mereological Monism and Humean Supervenience.Andrea Borghini & Giorgio Lando - forthcoming - Synthese:1-21.
Chemistry and Physics: No Need for Metaphysical Glue. [REVIEW]J. van Brakel - 2010 - Foundations of Chemistry 12 (2):123-136.
Similar books and articles
Can There Be Full Excuses for Morally Wrong Actions?Eduardo Rivera-López - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):124-142.
Being Wrong: Logics for False Belief.Christopher Steinsvold - 2011 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (3):245-253.
Microphysicalism Without Contingent Micro-Macro Laws.Philip Pettit - 1994 - Analysis 54 (4):253-57.
Review: Andreas Hüttemann: What's Wrong with Microphysicalism? [REVIEW]Jonathan Schaffer - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (2):253-257.
Is Really Something Wrong with Microphysicalism? Andreas Hüttemann, “What's Wrong with Microphysicalism?”.Holger Lyre - 2008 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (1):167-171.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #171,902 of 2,172,801 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #117,033 of 2,172,801 )
How can I increase my downloads?