Eksistensi Hak atas materi pornografi berdasarkan Norma kesusilaan

Abstract

The elucidation of Art. 4 Act No. 44, 2008 implicitly protects a person’s right to possess pornographic materials for his own use. This article argues that this reading opens up a number of moral problems. For one thing what is the limit of legal and illegal porn, a question which cannot be separated from our understanding of what is considered indecent behaviour. In addition, the porn industry, the source of pornographic materials, is considered immoral or against religious precepts in itself. The right to posses pornographic materials will be discussed from this perspective.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The 'Fine Art' of Pornography?Christopher Bartel - 2010 - In Dave Monroe (ed.), Porn: Philosophy for Everyone. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 153--65.
Drawing the Line: Art versus Pornography.Hans Maes - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (6):385-397.
The Lexicon of Offense: The Meanings of Torture, Porn, and ‘Torture Porn”.Steve Jones - 2012 - In Feona Attwood, Ian Hunter, Vincent Campbell & Sharon Lockyear (eds.), Controversial Images: Media Representations on the Edge. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 186-200.
Property in Human Biomaterials—Separating Persons and Things?Muireann Quigley - 2012 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 32 (4):659-683.
What is pornography?Michael C. Rea - 2001 - Noûs 35 (1):118–145.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-21

Downloads
195 (#96,610)

6 months
2 (#889,309)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references