Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (1):110-138 (2011)

Abstract
Consent's capacity to legitimise actions and claims is limited by conditions such as coercion, which render consent ineffective. A better understanding of the limits to consent's capacity to legitimise can shed light on a variety of applied debates, in political philosophy, bioethics, economics and law. I show that traditional paternalist explanations for limits to consent's capacity to legitimise cannot explain the central intuition that consent is often rendered ineffective when brought about by a rights violation or threatened rights violation. I argue that this intuition is an expression of the same principles of corrective justice that underlie norms of compensation and rectification. I show how these principles can explain and clarify core intuitions about conditions which render consent ineffective, including those concerned with the consenting agent's option set, his mental competence, and available information
Keywords CONSENT   EXPLOITATION   CORRECTIVE JUSTICE   RIGHTS   COERCION   PATERNALISM
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/174552411X549417
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,489
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Of the Original Contract".David Hume - 2007 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Are strikes extortionate?Ned Dobos - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (1):245-264.
How to Argue About Prostitution.Michelle Madden Dempsey - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (1):65-80.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics.Neil C. Manson - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
Consent Under Pressure: The Puzzle of Third Party Coercion.Joseph Millum - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (1):113-127.
A Defense of Subsequent Consent.Eric Chwang - 2009 - Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (1):117-131.
Consent and Its Cousins.William A. Edmundson - 2011 - Ethics 121 (2):335-53.
Consent and Informational Responsibility.Shaun D. Pattinson - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (3):176-179.
Autonomy, Consent and the Law.Sheila McLean - 2009 - Routledge-Cavendish.
Family Coercion and Valid Consent.Stephen D. Mallary, Bernard Gert & Charles M. Culver - 1986 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (2).
Safe, Sane, and Consensual—Consent and the Ethics of BDSM.Morten Ebbe Juul Nielsen - 2010 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (2):265-288.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-03-06

Total views
99 ( #119,743 of 2,520,893 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #100,832 of 2,520,893 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes