Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (1):25–53 (2004)
Pluralism—the incommensurability and, at times, incompatibility of objective ends—is not relativism, nor, a fortiori, subjectivism, nor the allegedly unbridgeable differences of emotional attitude on which some modern positivists, emotivists, existentialists, nationalists and, indeed, relativistic sociologists and anthropologists found their accounts.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Relativism, Realism, and Reflection.John Tasioulas - 1998 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 41 (4):377 – 410.
Making Noises in Counterpoint or Chorus: Putnam's Rejection of Relativism. [REVIEW]Jeffery L. Johnson - 1991 - Erkenntnis 34 (3):323--45.
Articles on Realism and Relativism.David-Hillel Ruben - 1989 - In J. Urmson & J. Ree (eds.), The Concise Encyclopedia of Western Philosophy. Harper Collins.
Is Design Relative or Real? Dennett on Intentional Relativism and Physical Realism.Reese M. Heitner - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (2):267-83.
Quasi-Realism, Sensibility Theory, and Ethical Relativism.Simon Kirchin - 2000 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (4):413 – 427.
Rationalism, Realism, and Relativism: Perspectives in Contemporary Moral Epistemology.Robert L. Arrington - 1989 - Cornell University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads87 ( #60,597 of 2,178,129 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #54,729 of 2,178,129 )
How can I increase my downloads?