Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (1):25–53 (2004)
Pluralism—the incommensurability and, at times, incompatibility of objective ends—is not relativism, nor, a fortiori, subjectivism, nor the allegedly unbridgeable differences of emotional attitude on which some modern positivists, emotivists, existentialists, nationalists and, indeed, relativistic sociologists and anthropologists found their accounts.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Making Noises in Counterpoint or Chorus: Putnam's Rejection of Relativism. [REVIEW]Jeffery L. Johnson - 1991 - Erkenntnis 34 (3):323--45.
Articles on Realism and Relativism.David-Hillel Ruben - 1989 - In J. Urmson & J. Ree (eds.), The Concise Encyclopedia of Western Philosophy. Harper Collins.
Is Design Relative or Real? Dennett on Intentional Relativism and Physical Realism.Reese M. Heitner - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (2):267-83.
Quasi-Realism, Sensibility Theory, and Ethical Relativism.Simon Kirchin - 2000 - Inquiry 43 (4):413 – 427.
Rationalism, Realism, and Relativism: Perspectives in Contemporary Moral Epistemology.Robert L. Arrington - 1989 - Cornell University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads82 ( #59,946 of 2,110,517 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #58,768 of 2,110,517 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.