Philosophia 20 (3):325-327 (1990)
In commenting on our earlier article in IPhilosophiaD, J P Day raises four issues: those concerning (1) the correct interpretation of the concept of "conditional offers," (2) the relationship of hard conditional offers to liberty, (3) the role of preferences in distinguishing offers from threats, and (4) the moral wrongness of some forms of offering. Two of these points, the second and the third, give rise to some further argument
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dorothy Day's Christian Conversion.June O'Connor - 1990 - Journal of Religious Ethics 18 (1):159 - 180.
Simple Truths, Hard Problems: Some Thoughts on Terror, Justice, and Self-Defence.Noam Chomsky - 2005 - Philosophy 80 (1):5-28.
Defeasible a Priori Justification: A Reply to Thurow.Albert Casullo - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):336–343.
The Soft-Line Solution to Pereboom's Four-Case Argument.Kristin Mickelson - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):595-617.
In Defense of Hard-Line Replies to the Multiple-Case Manipulation Argument.Daniel Haas - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (3):797-811.
Hard and Soft Offers as Constraints.Matti Häyry & Timo Airaksinen - 1988 - Philosophia 18 (4):385-398.
On Häyry and Airaksinen's 'Hard and Soft Offers as Constraints'.J. P. Day - 1990 - Philosophia 20 (3):321-323.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #311,329 of 2,158,679 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #354,589 of 2,158,679 )
How can I increase my downloads?