Abstract
Governmental reactions to crises like the COVID-19 pandemic can be seen as ethics communication. Governments can contain the disease and thereby mitigate the detrimental public health impact; allow the virus to spread to reach herd immunity; test, track, isolate, and treat; and suppress the disease regionally. An observation of Sweden and Finland showed a difference in feasible ways to communicate the chosen policy to the citizenry. Sweden assumed the herd immunity strategy and backed it up with health utilitarian arguments. This was easy to communicate to the Swedish people, who appreciated the voluntary restrictions approach and trusted their decision makers. Finland chose the contain and mitigate strategy and was towards the end of the observation period apparently hesitating between suppression and the test, track, isolate, and treat approach. Both are difficult to communicate to the general public accurately, truthfully, and acceptably. Apart from health utilitarian argumentation, something like the republican political philosophy or selective truth telling are needed. The application of republicanism to the issue, however, is problematic, and hiding the truth seems to go against the basic tenets of liberal democracy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0963180120000444
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,756
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

QALYfying the Value of Life.J. Harris - 1987 - Journal of Medical Ethics 13 (3):117-123.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Impacts of COVID19 Pandemic on Care of the Patients with Cancer.Esra Bilir - 2020 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 30 (3):111-113.
Ethics of Care and Philippine Politics During the COVID-19 Outbreak.Rogelio P. Bayod - 2020 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 30 (3):69-75.
Role of Information and Communication Technology During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Dennis Alfaro - 2020 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 30 (4):195-196.
The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Month of Bioethics in Finland.Matti Häyry - forthcoming - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics:1-9.
Health Care in India in the Prevailing COVID-19 Pandemic Scenario.Dhastagir Sultan Sheriff - 2020 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 30 (3):91-92.
Women Proficiency for Global Crises Management in Ethiopia.Debela Bedada - 2020 - International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM) 8 (4).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-05-22

Total views
5 ( #1,099,058 of 2,333,946 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #152,016 of 2,333,946 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes