Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (2):147-163 (2000)

Insoo Hyun
Case Western Reserve University
: Many adolescent patients with chronic medical conditions do not manage their illnesses very closely and often put themselves at risk for serious health complications. Setting aside cases of nonadherence that are due to practical difficulties involving the implementation of a management plan, a deeply problematic question remains. How should health care providers respond to adolescent patients who express a conscious and value-driven decision to pursue other goals and interests that are incompatible with their doctors' recommended directives? Using two guiding ethical principles, the "relevant difference principle" and the "principle of noninterference," as well as available empirical data on adolescent decision making and risk perception, the paper concludes that most adolescents ages 14 and older should be allowed to make self-determining decisions regarding the management of their chronic medical conditions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/ken.2000.0013
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,541
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Parents, Adolescents, and Consent for Research Participation.A. S. Iltis - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (3):332-346.
Toward a Coherent Account of Pediatric Decision Making.A. S. Iltis - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):526-552.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
54 ( #213,811 of 2,533,478 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #391,480 of 2,533,478 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes