Dialectica 56 (3):235–260 (2002)

Andrea Iacona
Università di Torino
The paper deals with the question of what it is for a sentence to express a proposition. In the first part of the paper I argue that a certain notion of proposition widely adopted in contemporary philosophy is more theoretically loaded than is commonly assumed. The fact is that some properties are typically assigned to propositions, but no support for the claim that there are things with those properties can be found in the “evidence” from ordinary language. My point is that if we assume about propositions only what is really intuitive, a certain kind of account of the expressing relation turns out to be precluded. As the classical picture of the expressing relation seems to presuppose that kind of account, this leads to think that there is something wrong with the classical picture of the expressing relation. In the second part of the paper I outline what I take to be a plausible but relatively modest account of the expressing relation. Some of the implications of the account outlined may appear undesirable. But I believe that the uneasiness depends on deep‐rooted philosophical prejudices rather than on a solid intuitive basis. In the last section I deal with some objections that may be raised against the claims defended in the paper
Keywords propositions  expressing  sentences
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2002.tb00241.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,805
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Objects of Thought.A. N. PRIOR - 1971 - Clarendon Press.
Collected Papers.Colin McGinn - 1988 - Philosophical Review 97 (2):278.
Language Created, Language Independent Entities.Stephen Shiffer - 1996 - Philosophical Topics 24 (1):149-167.
Objects of Thought.Kit Fine - 1973 - Philosophical Review 82 (3):392.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Synsymmetry.Steven M. Rosen - 1975 - Scientia (International Review of Scientific Synthesis) 110 (5-8):539-549.
One Ought Too Many.Stephen Finlay & Justin Snedegar - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (1):102-124.
Replies to Eriksson, Martin and Moore.Mitchell S. Green - 2010 - Acta Analytica 25 (1):105-117.
On Believing, Saying and Expressing.Thomas C. Ryckman - 1989 - Synthese 79 (2):191 - 200.
Expressing One’s Mind.David M. Rosenthal - 2010 - Acta Analytica 25 (1):21 - 34.
Sense and the Computation of Reference.Reinhard Muskens - 2004 - Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (4):473 - 504.
Expression, Thought, and Language.Henry Jackman - 2003 - Philosophia 31 (1-2):33-54.
The Dual Nature of Law.Robert Alexy - 2010 - Ratio Juris 23 (2):167-182.


Added to PP index

Total views
52 ( #196,281 of 2,425,814 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #545,994 of 2,425,814 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes