Cognitive gadgets and cognitive priors

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some of the foundations of Heyes’ radical reasoning seem to be based on a fractional selection of available evidence. Using an ethological perspective, we argue against Heyes’ rapid dismissal of innate cognitive instincts. Heyes’ use of fMRI studies of literacy to claim that culture assembles pieces of mental technology seems an example of incorrect reverse inferences and overlap theories pervasive in cognitive neuroscience.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,363

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Testing cognitive gadgets.Cecilia Heyes - 2019 - Mind and Language 34 (4):551-559.
Cognition blindness and cognitive gadgets.Cecilia Heyes - 2019 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42.
Twenty questions about cultural cognitive gadgets.Andrew Whiten - 2019 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42.
Executive functions are cognitive gadgets.Senne Braem & Bernhard Hommel - 2019 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42.
Cognitive Anthropology Is a Cognitive Science.James S. Boster - 2012 - Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (3):372-378.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-14

Downloads
10 (#890,271)

6 months
1 (#451,398)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?Russell A. Poldrack - 2006 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (2):59-63.
Vehicles: Experiments in Synthetic Psychology.Valentino Braitenberg - 1986 - Philosophical Review 95 (1):137-139.

Add more references