On Necessity as a Defence to Crime: Possibilities, Problems and the Limits of Justification and Excuse

Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (1):29-49 (2009)
Abstract
The article reviews recent developments in England in the law of necessity as a defence to crime and calls for its further extension. It argues that the defence of necessity presents the criminal law with difficult questions of competing values and the ordering of harms. English law has taken a nuanced position on the respective roles of the courts and the legislature in the ordering of harms, although the development of the law has been pragmatic rather than coherently theorised. The law has granted necessity some scope as an exculpatory principle in the law of general defences, but it has also respected the primacy of the legislature as the legitimate arbiter of many of the competitions of value that necessity throws up. The recognition of necessity has not been in the form of a single unified defence of that name. Rather it has taken the form of a number of defences, based on a principle of necessity, but with different nomenclature and different rationales. This approach to necessity is defended as right in terms of principle and policy. Any further development of necessity as a general defence should be restricted to two contexts, namely those of emergencies, and of conflicts of duty, where a danger of death or serious injury is present
Keywords Defences  Necessity  Justification and excuse
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11572-008-9062-5
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,472
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Excusing Crime.Jeremy Horder - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
An Attitudinal Theory of Excuse.Peter Westen - 2005 - Law and Philosophy 25 (3):289-375.
Gauging Criminal Harm: A Living-Standard Analysis.von Hirsch Andrew & Jareborg Nils - 1991 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 11 (1):1-38.
Choice, Character, and Criminal Liability.R. A. Duff - 1993 - Law and Philosophy 12 (4):345 - 383.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2010-08-10

Total downloads
96 ( #56,714 of 2,210,885 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #356,854 of 2,210,885 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature