Pseudoclefts Crosslinguistically

Natural Language Semantics 6 (1):3-28 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pseudoclefts have been divided into two types, specificational and predicational (Akmajian 1970; Higgins 1979). The two types differ in interpretive as well as syntactic characteristics. In this paper we argue that the availability of the specificational type depends on the particular lexical items that a language employs to form pseudoclefts. We discuss the significance of these findings for linguistic theory

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,272

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
59 (#290,792)

6 months
12 (#449,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Reasons and that‐clauses.James Pryor - 2007 - Philosophical Issues 17 (1):217-244.
On The Relation of Connectivity and Specificational Pseudoclefts.Daphna Heller - 2002 - Natural Language Semantics 10 (4):243-284.
Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 9.Emar Maier, Corien Bary & Janneke Huitink (eds.) - 2005 - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reference and definite descriptions.Keith S. Donnellan - 1966 - Philosophical Review 75 (3):281-304.
Generalized quantifiers and natural language.John Barwise & Robin Cooper - 1981 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (2):159--219.
Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language.Jon Barwise - 1980 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4:159.

View all 8 references / Add more references