A Simple Logic of Concepts
Journal of Philosophical Logic:1-26 (forthcoming)
Abstract
In Pietroski (2018) a simple representation language called SMPL is introduced, construed as a hypothesis about core conceptual structure. The present work is a study of this system from a logical perspective. In addition to establishing a completeness result and a complexity characterization for reasoning in the system, we also pinpoint its expressive limits, in particular showing that the fourth corner in the square of opposition (“Some_not”) eludes expression. We then study a seemingly small extension, called SMPL+, which allows for a minimal predicate-binding operator. Perhaps surprisingly, the resulting system is shown to encode precisely the concepts expressible in first-order logic. However, unlike the latter class, the class of SMPL+ expressions admits a simple procedural (context-free) characterization. Our contribution brings together research strands in logic—including natural logic, modal logic, description logic, and hybrid logic—with recent advances in semantics and philosophy of language.Author Profiles
DOI
10.1007/s10992-022-09685-1
My notes
Similar books and articles
Interpretations of intuitionist logic in non-normal modal logics.Colin Oakes - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (1):47-60.
The Dynamification of Modal Dependence Logic.Pietro Galliani - 2013 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 22 (3):269-295.
A spatial modal logic with a location interpretation.Norihiro Kamide - 2005 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (4):331.
From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory.Hans Kamp & Uwe Reyle - 1993 - Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Belnap–Dunn Modal Logic with Value Operators.Yuanlei Lin & Minghui Ma - 2020 - Studia Logica 109 (4):759-789.
A modal interpretation of the logic of interrogation.Rani Nelken & Chung-Chieh Shan - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (3):251-271.
Games for Hybrid Logic.Robert Freiman - 2021 - In Alexandra Silva, Renata Wassermann & Ruy de Queiroz (eds.), Logic, Language, Information, and Computation: 27th International Workshop, Wollic 2021, Virtual Event, October 5–8, 2021, Proceedings. Springer Verlag. pp. 133-149.
Natural Deduction for Modal Logic with a Backtracking Operator.Jonathan Payne - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (3):237-258.
Kripke semantics for modal substructural logics.Norihiro Kamide - 2002 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (4):453-470.
Deontic Modals.Jennifer Carr - 2017 - In Tristram McPherson & David Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. Routledge. pp. 194-210.
From worlds to probabilities: A probabilistic semantics for modal logic.Charles B. Cross - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (2):169 - 192.
Incompleteness Results in Kripke Bundle Semantics.Kazuaki Nagaoka & Eiko Isoda - 1997 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 43 (4):485-498.
Intensional and Higher-Order Modal Logic: With Applications to Montague Semantics.Daniel Gallin - 1975 - Amsterdam, Netherlands: American Elsevier Pub. Co..
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-11-23
Downloads
76 (#161,218)
6 months
76 (#13,911)
2022-11-23
Downloads
76 (#161,218)
6 months
76 (#13,911)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
References found in this work
The semantic conception of truth and the foundations of semantics.Alfred Tarski - 1943 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4 (3):341-376.
Generalized quantifiers and natural language.John Barwise & Robin Cooper - 1981 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (2):159--219.
Conjoining Meanings: Semantics Without Truth Values.Paul M. Pietroski - 2018 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
A Natural History of Negation.Jon Barwise & Laurence R. Horn - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (3):1103.