Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (4):547-563 (2008)
In this paper, I assess Martha Nussbaum's application of the capabilities approach to non-human animals for both its philosophical merits and its potential to affect public policy. I argue that there are currently three main philosophical problems with the theory that need further attention. After discussing these problems, I show how focusing on factory farming would enable Nussbaum to demonstrate the philosophical merits of the capabilities approach as well as to suggest more powerful and effectives changes in our public policies.
|Keywords||Martha Nussbaum the capabilities approach animals public policy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Nussbaum and the Capacities of Animals.T. J. Kasperbauer - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (5):977-997.
Similar books and articles
Toward a Theory of the Basic Minimum.Dale Dorsey - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (4):423-445.
Determining Public Policy and Resource Allocation Priorities for Mitigating Natural Hazards: A Capabilities-Based Approach.Colleen Murphy & Paolo Gardoni - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (4):489-504.
Non-Reductionist Naturalism: Nussbaum Between Aristotle and Hume.John M. Alexander - 2005 - Res Publica 11 (2):157-183.
The Capabilities Approach, Religious Practices, and the Importance of Recognition.Thom Brooks - manuscript
Saving the Polar Bear, Saving the World: Can the Capabilities Approach Do Justice to Humans, Animals and Ecosystems? [REVIEW]Elizabeth Cripps - 2010 - Res Publica 16 (1):1-22.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads76 ( #69,932 of 2,178,178 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #54,693 of 2,178,178 )
How can I increase my downloads?