Bradley Studies 10 (1/2):65-87 (2004)
AbstractA striking feature of Bradley’s thought is its dialectical structure. This is evident in all his writings especially Ethical Studies in which he investigates the topic of self-realization within the larger context of the question of the nature of morality. In the Ethical Studies Bradley looks at different accounts of morality vis-à-vis the demand of self realization and finds none of them absolutely adequate albeit one is relatively adequate than the other. For this reason he condemns the “ethics of pleasure for pleasure sake” and rates it lower than “ethics of duty for duty sake” even though from a larger standpoints he finds “ethics of duty for duty sake” equally inadequate whereas it takes it that the “ethics of my stations and duties” fares better than “ethics of duty for duty sake” even if it does not offer us any resting place. Although the structure of Bradley’s Ethical Studies is dialectical and to this extent is Bradley’s most Hegelian writing it is a mistake not to pay attention to Bradley’s divergence from Hegelianism which is already evident in Ethical Studies especially with regard to what he makes of the relationship between morality, religion and philosophy. What this means that despite his sympathy to dialectical thinking, Bradley’s relation to dialectics in the end is ambivalent.
Similar books and articles
F. H. Bradley, Duns Scotus, and the Idea of a Dialectic.Leslie Armour - 1995 - Bradley Studies 1 (1):6-29.
Bradley and the Problematic Status of Metaphysics: In Search of an Adequate Ontology of Appearance.Damian Ilodigwe - 2005 - Cambridge Scholars Press.
Jamess Appraisal of Bradley.Damian Ilodigwe - 2006 - Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 12 (2):37-73.
A Feminist Reconstruction of Bradley’s Ethical Idealism.Andrea Austen - 1996 - Idealistic Studies 26 (1):17-28.
Religious Consciousness and the Realisation of the True Self: Bernard Bosanquet’s Views on Religion in What Religion Is.Stamatoula Panagakou - 1999 - Bradley Studies 5 (2):139-161.
Why did Bradley matter to Whitehead?: Some Questions Concerning Bradley’s Doctrine of Finite Centres.Pierfrancesco Basile - 2004 - Bradley Studies 10 (1/2):15-32.
F. H. Bradley's Moral Philosophy: A Positive Exposition.Kenneth Errol Aspevig - 1983 - Dissertation, York University (Canada)
Self-Realization As Perfection In Bradley’s Ethical Studies.David J. Crossley - 1977 - Idealistic Studies 7 (3):199-220.
James and Bradley’s Absolutism.Damian Ilodigwe - 2005 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (4):603-620.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads