Res Publica 14 (4):313-316 (2008)

The article is a brief response to Jacob Blair’s critique of David Rodin’s argument in War and Self-Defense that there are circumstances in which war conceivably could be justified not as self-defence, but as law enforcement or punishment. It argues that while Rodin’s position potentially is less dilemmatic than Blair suggests, Blair nevertheless usefully highlights tensions within it. Blair’s own argument in favour of ar as law-enforcement is suggestive, but in no way conclusive.
Keywords Ethics of war  Self-defense  National defense  Aggression  David Rodin
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-008-9076-9
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,374
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

War and Self Defense.David Rodin - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
War and Self-Defense.David Rodin - 2004 - Ethics and International Affairs 18 (1):63–68.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

War and Self-Defense.David Rodin - 2004 - Ethics and International Affairs 18 (1):63–68.
Acquaintance.Benj Hellie - 2009 - In Tim Bayne, Axel Cleeremans & Patrick Wilken (eds.), Oxford Companion to Consciousness. Oxford University Press.
A Rhetoric of Argument.J. Anthony Blair - 1984 - Teaching Philosophy 7 (1):70-72.
David Rodin's War and Self-Defense.David Garren - 2003 - Journal of Military Ethics 2 (3):245-251.


Added to PP index

Total views
30 ( #349,197 of 2,420,360 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,979 of 2,420,360 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes