Justice, Fairness, and Membership in a Class: Conceptual Confusions and Moral Puzzles in the Regulation of Human Subjects Research
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (3):488-501 (2011)
This essay examines conceptual difficulties with one of the ways in which justice has been understood and applied the ethical and regulatory review of human research. Justice requires the fair distribution of the benefits and burdens of research. Class membership is seen as justifying inclusion in higher hazard-no benefit research from which members of potentially vulnerable classes, such as children, typically would be excluded. I argue that class membership does not do the justificatory work it is thought to do and that the use of class membership to justify inclusion in higher hazard-no benefit research leads to unjustified discrimination of sick children and offers special protections to healthy children
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Regulatory and Ethical Principles in Research Involving Children and Individuals with Developmental Disabilities.Eric G. Yan & Kerim M. Munir - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (1):31 – 49.
Group Membership and Class Membership.Robert S. Hartman - 1952 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 13 (3):353-370.
From the Ideal Market to the Ideal Clinic: Constructing a Normative Standard of Fairness for Human Subjects Research.T. Phillips - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (1):79-106.
Is It 'Who I Am', 'What I Can Get Away With', or 'What You've Done to Me'? A Multi-Theory Examination of Employee Misconduct.Deborah L. Kidder - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 57 (4):389-398.
Challenging Research on Human Subjects: Justice and Uncompensated Harms.Stephen Napier - 2013 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (1):29-51.
Research Exceptionalism.James Wilson & David Hunter - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (8):45-54.
The Ethical Analysis of Risks and Potential Benefits in Human Subjects Research: History, Theory, and Implications for U.S. Regulation.Charles Weijer - unknown
The Contemporary Significance of Confucianism.Tang Yijie & Yan Xin - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (4):477-501.
The Aggressiveness of Playful Arguments.Dale Hample, Bing Han & David Payne - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (4):405-421.
Multiple Forms of Exploitation in International Research: The Need for Multiple Standards of Fairness.Jeremy Snyder - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):40-41.
Added to index2011-08-23
Total downloads9 ( #464,124 of 2,172,876 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #324,901 of 2,172,876 )
How can I increase my downloads?