Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):526-552 (2010)

Ana S. Iltis
Wake Forest University
Within and among societies, there are competing understandings of the status of children, including debates over whether they can bear rights and, if so, which rights they bear and against whom, and their capacity to make decisions and be held responsible and accountable for actions. There also are different understandings of what constitutes a family; what authority parents have over and regarding their children; and what should happen to children who are without parents because of death, desertion, or imprisonment. These and other related debates reflect deep differences in worldviews, in how one understands the legitimate role of the state, in how one comes to know the proper way to raise children, and so on. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child purports to reflect international convergence on the rights of children, on how decisions concerning children should be made, and on how children ought to be treated by the state and by their parents. This paper examines whether the Convention's framework for decision making concerning children is an appropriate framework for pediatric bioethics. Questions about how to make health care decisions for children ultimately are questions of who is in authority to make and judge such decisions. Establishing who is in authority, determining whether there are any limits to that authority and, if so, defining those limits should be the focus of efforts to develop and implement a pediatric decision-making framework
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jmp/jhq039
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,229
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Child as Living Donor: Parental Consent and Child Assent.Rosalind Ekman Ladd - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (2):143-148.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Re-Thinking the Role of the Family in Medical Decision-Making.Mark J. Cherry - 2015 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40 (4):451-472.
Medical Decision Making and the Family: An Examination of Controversies.M. Wang, P. -C. Lo & R. Fan - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):493-498.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Parental Authority and Pediatric Bioethical Decision Making.M. J. Cherry - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):553-572.
The Moral and Political Status of Children.David Archard - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):490-492.
Circumscribed Autonomy: Children, Care, and Custody.Hugh LaFollette - 1998 - In Uma Narayan & Julia Bartkowiak (eds.), Having and Raising Children. Pennsylvania State University Press.
The Moral and Political Status of Children.David Archard & Colin M. [eds] Macleod - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):490-492.


Added to PP index

Total views
35 ( #311,875 of 2,455,487 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,205 of 2,455,487 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes