Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):526-552 (2010)
AbstractWithin and among societies, there are competing understandings of the status of children, including debates over whether they can bear rights and, if so, which rights they bear and against whom, and their capacity to make decisions and be held responsible and accountable for actions. There also are different understandings of what constitutes a family; what authority parents have over and regarding their children; and what should happen to children who are without parents because of death, desertion, or imprisonment. These and other related debates reflect deep differences in worldviews, in how one understands the legitimate role of the state, in how one comes to know the proper way to raise children, and so on. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child purports to reflect international convergence on the rights of children, on how decisions concerning children should be made, and on how children ought to be treated by the state and by their parents. This paper examines whether the Convention's framework for decision making concerning children is an appropriate framework for pediatric bioethics. Questions about how to make health care decisions for children ultimately are questions of who is in authority to make and judge such decisions. Establishing who is in authority, determining whether there are any limits to that authority and, if so, defining those limits should be the focus of efforts to develop and implement a pediatric decision-making framework
Similar books and articles
Parental Authority and Pediatric Bioethical Decision Making.M. J. Cherry - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):553-572.
Adolescent Psychological Development, Parenting Styles, and Pediatric Decision Making.B. C. Partridge - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):518-525.
Deep Brain Stimulation in Children: Parental Authority Versus Shared Decision-Making.Farah Focquaert - 2011 - Neuroethics 6 (3):447-455.
Picu Prometheus: Ethical Issues in the Treatment of Very Sick Children in Paediatric Intensive Care.Michael Gill - unknown
Parent–Child Roles in Decision Making About Medical Research.Victoria A. Miller, William W. Reynolds & Robert M. Nelson - 2008 - Ethics and Behavior 18 (2-3):161 – 181.
Beyond the Best Interests of Children: Four Views of the Family and of Foundational Disagreements Regarding Pediatric Decision Making.H. T. Engelhardt - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):499-517.
Parental Discretion and Children's Rights: Background and Implications for Medical Decision-Making.Ferdinand Schoeman - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (1):45-62.
Savior Siblings, Parenting and the Moral Valorization of Children.Kimberly Strong, Ian Kerridge & Miles Little - 2014 - Bioethics 28 (4):187-193.
A Goodness-of-Fit Approach to Informed Consent for Pediatric Intervention Research.Jessica Masty & Celia Fisher - 2008 - Ethics and Behavior 18 (2-3):139 – 160.
The Moral and Political Status of Children.David Archard - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):490-492.
Adolescent and Parental Perceptions of Medical Decision-Making in Hong Kong.H. U. I. Edwin - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (9):516-526.
Circumscribed Autonomy: Children, Care, and Custody.Hugh LaFollette - 1998 - In Uma Narayan & Julia Bartkowiak (eds.), Having and Raising Children. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Acquiescence is Not Agreement: The Problem of Marginalization in Pediatric Decision Making.Amy E. Caruso Brown - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (6):4-16.
Re-Thinking the Role of the Family in Medical Decision-Making.Mark J. Cherry - 2015 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40 (4):451-472.
The Mature Minor: Some Critical Psychological Reflections on the Empirical Bases.B. C. Partridge - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (3):283-299.
Best Interests or Harm to Reverse Parental Decisions: Each in Its Own Domain.Allan J. Jacobs - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):41-44.
References found in this work
Parental Refusals of Medical Treatment: The Harm Principle as Threshold for State Intervention.Douglas Diekema - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):243-264.
The Best-Interests Standard as Threshold, Ideal, and Standard of Reasonableness.L. M. Kopelman - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (3):271-289.
Consent to Medical Treatment: The Complex Interplay of Patients, Families, and Physicians.Ruiping Fan & Julia Tao - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (2):139 – 148.
When Adolescents "Mismanage" Their Chronic Medical Conditions: An Ethical Exploration.Insoo Hyun - 2000 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (2):147-163.
The Child as Living Donor: Parental Consent and Child Assent.Rosalind Ekman Ladd - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (2):143-148.