Are we finished with the ethnophilosophy debate? A multi-perspective conversation

Filosofia Theoretica: Journal of African Philosophy, Culture and Religions 8 (2):111-138 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In line with the tradition of the Conversational School of Philosophy, this essay provides a rare and unique space of discourse for the authors to converse about the place of the ‘ethno’ in African philosophy. This conversation is a revisit, a renewal of the key positions that have coloured the ethnophilosophy debate by the conversers who themselves are notable contributors to arguments for and against the importance of ethnophilosophy in the unfolding of African philosophy particularly in the last decade or so. There are four key positions that have been argued for in the pages of this paper: ethnophilosophy is not African philosophy and it is useless and inimical to the growth of African philosophy and should thus be jettisoned – Matolino; ethnophilosophy is the foundation for African philosophy as it provides the raw materials for African philosophical discourse – Ogbonnaya and Agada; ethnophilosophy has some value for African philosophy but it is definitely not the foundation for genuine African philosophy the way criticism and rigours are – Attoe; and ethnophilosophy can be adequately conceived as African philosophy particularly in terms of its etymology as culture or race philosophy, dealing with a philosophical or critical reflections on, and exposition of, immanent principles in African thought – Mangena and Etieyibo. These conversers provide good arguments for the positions they hold, arguments that are of course, open for further interrogation. Two points can be concluded from the ethnophilosophy debate provided in this essay: the disparities in views among conversers it seems, stem ultimately from the understanding of ethnophilosophy that each converser holds, which varies from the notion of a method used at some point in the history of African philosophy, to an etymological understanding as culture philosophy; and the debate about ethnophilosophy in the spirit of any philosophical tradition remains a perennial one that is yet to be concluded. This essay certainly concretises what is on ground and paves the way for further discussions. Keywords: Ethno, African philosophy, Foundationalist, Universalist, Particularist, The common moral position, Ethnophilosophy

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An essay concerning the foundational myth of ethnophilosophy.Aribiah David Attoe - 2016 - Filosofia Theoretica: Journal of African Philosophy, Culture and Religions 5 (1):100-108.
Pearce's "african philosophy and the sociological thesis" a response.L. D. Keita - 1994 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (2):192-203.
Francophone African Philosophy: History, trends and influences.Pius M. Mosima - 2018 - Filosofia Theoretica: Journal of African Philosophy, Culture and Religions 7 (1):1-33.
How African is philosophy in Africa?Paulin J. Hountondji - 2018 - Filosofia Theoretica: Journal of African Philosophy, Culture and Religions 7 (3):9-18.
In defense of afro-japanese ethnophilosophy.Fidelis U. Okafor - 1997 - Philosophy East and West 47 (3):363-381.
African philosophy and the sociological thesis.Carole Pearce - 1992 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 22 (4):440-460.
African Tradition, Philosophy, and Modernization.Polycarp Ikuenobe - 2001 - Philosophical Papers 30 (3):245-259.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-28

Downloads
18 (#708,051)

6 months
5 (#244,526)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references