The Concept of ‘Metaphysical Liberalism’

The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 41:120-125 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There have been many discussions about ‘Liberalism’ in modern political philosophy. In this paper, I want to discuss the liberal principles of political philosophy on the metaphysical level. This includes the liberal mind, the liberal consciousness, and the liberal ethos, all of which are presupposed in our liberal behaviors, and in turn serve as fundamental principles in any multicultural society. I want to emphasize the liberal tendencies of self-criticism and of the critical way of thinking in European traditional metaphysics, such as Plato’s dialectics or Kant’s philosophy of criticism. The latter is also the logic of dialogue which produces an endless questioning of possible universal truths. I group these characteristics under the label ‘Metaphysical Liberalism’ and assess them from three standpoints: critical agnosticism; methodological falsificationism; and pluralistic universalism. These three points enable us to remain self-conscious of the limitation of any kind of special theory or thought in order to prevent the emergence of any dogmatic belief-system. Such liberal attitudes that allow the realization of individual ideas and thoughts without any political coercion in turn sustain a democratic federalism that creates space for the expression of public opinion even while protecting such space. Such a situation, however, is possible only by educating ourselves in this metaphysical method.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Political Liberalism and Public Reason.Onora O’Neill - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (3):411-428.
Metaphysical Premises And Types Of Liberal Ideology.Igor I. Yevlampiev - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 10:137-142.
Justice and Restrain.João Cardoso Rosas - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:153-157.
Justice and Restrain.João Cardoso Rosas - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:153-157.
Spinoza’s Liberalism.Matthew J. Kisner - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (11):782-793.
Can Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach be a Foundation of Politically Liberal Theory of Justice?Yuko Kamishima - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:293-298.
Rawls, Liberalism, and Democracy.John Skorupski - 2017 - Ethics 128 (1):173-198.
A Property Owning Democracy or a Liberal (Democratic) Socialism?Wonsup Jung - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 41:132-139.
In Defence of Comprehensive Liberalism.Ben Colburn - 2012 - Philosophy and Public Issues - Filosofia E Questioni Pubbliche 2 (1):17-29.
The Rights-Bearing Citizen as a Problematic Actor of Liberal Politics.Filiz Kartal - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:159-163.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-08

Downloads
1 (#1,884,204)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references