How Often Do We Use a Definite Description to Talk About its Semantic Referent?

Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):7-12 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I respond to the objections put forth by Kresimir Agbaba 22: 1-6) against my earlier paper 20: 7-13) in which I argue that given Donnellan's formulation|as well as Kripke's and Salmon's gen- eralized accounts|an attributive use of a denite description is a very rare linguistic phenomenon

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-15

Downloads
490 (#64,617)

6 months
104 (#65,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ilhan Inan
Koc University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reference and definite descriptions.Keith S. Donnellan - 1966 - Philosophical Review 75 (3):281-304.
Speaker’s Reference and Semantic Reference.Saul A. Kripke - 1977 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2 (1):255-276.
Speaker's reference and semantic reference.Saul A. Kripke - 1977 - In Peter A. French, Theodore Edward Uehling & Howard K. Wettstein, Studies in the philosophy of language. Morris: University of Minnesota, Morris. pp. 255-296.
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.Nathan Salmon - 2004 - In Marga Reimer & Anne Bezuidenhout, Descriptions and beyond. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 230--260.

Add more references