On some Consequences of the Definitional Unprovability of Hume's Principle

In Pierre Joray (ed.), Contemporary Perspectives on Logicism and the Foundations of Mathematics. CDRS (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Generalized definitional reflection and the inversion principle.Peter Schroeder-Heister - 2007 - Logica Universalis 1 (2):355-376.
Hume = small Hume.Jeffrey Ketland - 2002 - Analysis 62 (1):92–93.
Is Hume's principle analytic?Crispin Wright - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (1):307-333.
Shocking(?) Unprovability.Harvey M. Friedman - unknown
On Some Criticisms of Hume’s Principle of Proportioning Cause to Effect.John Beaudoin - 1999 - Philo 2 (2):26-40.
Who needs (to assume) Hume's principle?Andrew Boucher - manuscript
A Bayesian proof of a Humean principle.Donald Gillies - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2):255-256.
On finite hume.Fraser Macbride - 2000 - Philosophia Mathematica 8 (2):150-159.
Hume on the Distinction of Reason.Paul Hoffman - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (6):1131-1141.
Sympathy and Benevolence in Hume's Moral Psychology.Rico Vitz - 2004 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (3):261-275.
Hume’s Argument for the Ontological Independence of Simple Properties.Jani Hakkarainen - 2011 - Metaphysica 12 (2):197-212.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-30

Downloads
44 (#353,833)

6 months
13 (#184,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Luca Incurvati
University of Amsterdam

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references