Diversity in proof appraisal

In Brendan Larvor (ed.), Mathematical Cultures: The London Meetings 2012--2014. Basel, Switzerland: pp. 163-179 (2016)

Abstract

We investigated whether mathematicians typically agree about the qualities of mathematical proofs. Between-mathematician consensus in proof appraisals is an implicit assumption of many arguments made by philosophers of mathematics, but to our knowledge the issue has not previously been empirically investigated. We asked a group of mathematicians to assess a specific proof on four dimensions, using the framework identified by Inglis and Aberdein (2015). We found widespread disagreement between our participants about the aesthetics, intricacy, precision and utility of the proof, suggesting that a priori assumptions about the consistency of mathematical proof appraisals are unreasonable.

Download options

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-02-25

Downloads
212 (#55,940)

6 months
39 (#22,306)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Andrew Aberdein
Florida Institute of Technology
Matthew Inglis
Loughborough University of Technology

References found in this work

The Past and Future of Experimental Philosophy.Thomas Nadelhoffer & Eddy Nahmias - 2007 - Philosophical Explorations 10 (2):123 – 149.
Mathematical Explanation.Mark Steiner - 1978 - Philosophical Studies 34 (2):135 - 151.
Systems of Predicative Analysis.Solomon Feferman - 1964 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 29 (1):1-30.
Explanation, Independence and Realism in Mathematics.Michael D. Resnik & David Kushner - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (2):141-158.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Similar books and articles

Arguing Around Mathematical Proofs.Michel Dufour - 2013 - In Andrew Aberdein & Ian J. Dove (eds.), The Argument of Mathematics. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 61-76.
Mathematical Fit: A Case Study.Manya Raman-Sundström & Lars-Daniel Öhman - forthcoming - Philosophia Mathematica:nkw015.
Knowledge of Mathematics Without Proof.Alexander Paseau - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (4):775-799.
Mathematical Explanations That Are Not Proofs.Marc Lange - 2018 - Erkenntnis 83 (6):1285-1302.
Proof, Logic and Formalization.Michael Detlefsen (ed.) - 1992 - London, England: Routledge.
Surveyability and Mathematical Certainty.Kai Büttner - 2017 - Axiomathes 27 (1):113-128.
What is a Proof?Reinhard Kahle - 2015 - Axiomathes 25 (1):79-91.
The Uses of Argument in Mathematics.Andrew Aberdein - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):287-301.