Time, Persistence, and Causality: Towards a Dynamic View of Temporal Reality

Dissertation, Umeå University (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The thesis revolves around the following questions. What is time? Is time tensed or tenseless? Do things endure or perdure, i.e. do things persist by being wholly present at many times, or do they persist by having temporal parts? Do causes bring their effects into existence, or are they only correlated with each other? Within a realist approach to metaphysics, the author claims that the tensed view of time, the endurance view of persistence, and the production view of causality naturally combine into what is called the dynamic view of temporal reality, and that the tenseless view of time, the perdurance view of persistence, and the correlation view of causality naturally combine into what is called the static view of temporal reality. The author argues in favour of a dynamic view. During the discussion a number of metaphysical problems are addressed. First, it is argued that the charges that the dynamic view is contradictory, made by J.M.E. McTaggart and David Lewis, are viciously circular. Secondly, it is argued that the static view cannot account for change, and deprives metaphysics of essential means to provide natural explanations to empirical phenomena. Thirdly, the author presents a novel account of the nature of necessary causal production. He suggests that the traditional conception of causes as essentially being external to the effects should be abandoned, and that causal production instead should be explicated in terms of reciprocal interactions between coexistent substances.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reviews. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2004 - Dialectica 58 (2):273-274.
In Defence of a Dynamic View of Reality.Jerzy Gołosz - 2020 - In Patricia Hanna (ed.), An anthology of philosophical studies, vol. 14. Athens, Greece: Athens Institute for Education and Research. pp. 35-47.
Is There Change on the B-theory of Time?Luca Banfi - 2021 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 17 (1):(B1)5-28.
The concept of time.Roger Teichmann - 1995 - New York: St. Martin's Press, Scholarly and Reference Division.
Response to Robin Le Poidevin's 'Is Precedence a Secondary Quality?'.Michael Tooley - 2001 - In L. Nathan Oaklander (ed.), The Importance of Time. Dordrecht: Kluwer. pp. 267-84.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-07-23

Downloads
377 (#56,182)

6 months
109 (#44,126)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rognvaldur Ingthorsson
University of Helsinki

Citations of this work

Dissolving McTaggart's Paradox.Tobias Hansson Wahlberg - 2013 - In Christer Svennerlind, Almäng Jan & Rögnvaldur Ingthorsson (eds.), Johanssonian Investigations: Essays in Honour of Ingvar Johansson on His Seventieth Birthday. Ontos Verlag. pp. 240-258.
Dissolving McTaggart's Paradox.Ingthorsson Rögnvaldur - 2013 - In Christer Svennerlind, Almäng Jan & Rögnvaldur Ingthorsson (eds.), Johanssonian Investigations: Essays in Honour of Ingvar Johansson on His Seventieth Birthday. Ontos Verlag. pp. 5--240.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references