David Ingram
Loyola University, Chicago
I propose to criticize two strands of argument - contractarian and utilitarian – that liberals have put forth in defense of economic coercion, based on the notion of justifiable paternalism. To illustrate my argument, I appeal to the example of forced labor migration, driven by the exigencies of market forces. In particular, I argue that the forced migration of a special subset of unemployed workers lacking other means of subsistence cannot be redeemed paternalistically as freedom or welfare enhancing in the long run. I further argue that contractarian and utilitarian approaches are normatively incapable of appreciating this fact because the kinds of reasons that they adduce for justifying the long-term freedom-enhancing consequences of forced migration are not ones that would be acceptable to the migrants themselves. I conclude that only a discourse ethical approach, which mandates direct, empathetic communication between would-be migrants and members of potential host communities, captures the full range of reasons that would be acceptable to both migrants and members of these communities. These reasons – appealing both to agency-enhancing communal attachments as well as to agency-enhancing freedom of choice – fully reveals the extent to which a global capitalist system composed of relatively closed national communities coerces the world’s poorest migrants
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,261
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Justice as Fairness: A Restatement.John Rawls (ed.) - 2001 - Harvard University Press.
Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - Philosophy 52 (199):102-105.
World Poverty and Human Rights.Thomas Pogge - 2002 - Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1):1-7.
Justice as Fairness: A Restatement.C. L. Ten - 2003 - Mind 112 (447):563-566.
World Poverty and Human Rights.Thomas Pogge - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (4):455-458.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Domination and Migration: An Alternative Approach to the Legitimacy of Migration Controls.Iseult Honohan - 2014 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (1):31-48.
The Rights of Migration.Colin Grey - 2014 - Legal Theory 20 (1):25-51.
Introduction: Domination, Migration and Non-Citizens.Iseult Honohan & Marit Hovdal-Moan - 2014 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (1):1-9.
The Ethics of Migrant Welfare.Hartley Dean - 2011 - Ethics and Social Welfare 5 (1):18-35.
Migration Madness: Five Policy Dilemmas.Dhananjayan Sriskandarajah - 2006 - Studies in Christian Ethics 19 (1):21-37.
Temporary Migrants, Partial Citizenship and Hypermigration.Rainer Bauböck - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (5):665-693.


Added to PP index

Total views
24 ( #457,816 of 2,455,894 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,201 of 2,455,894 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes