Oup Usa (1992)

Abstract
This book undermines privacy scepticism, proving a strong theoretical foundation for many of our everyday and legal privacy claims. Inness argues that intimacy is the core of privacy, including privacy appeals in tort and constitutional law. She explores the myriad of debates and puts forth an intimacy and control-based account of privacy which escapes these criticisms.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 1996
Buy this book Find it on Amazon.com
ISBN(s) 9780195104608   9780195071481   0195104609   3540167587   0195071484
DOI 10.2307/2108325
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,114
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Cultural Appropriation and the Intimacy of Groups.C. Thi Nguyen & Matthew Strohl - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (4):981-1002.
A Defense of Privacy as Control.Leonhard Menges - 2021 - The Journal of Ethics 25 (3):385-402.
Indiscriminate Mass Surveillance and the Public Sphere.Titus Stahl - 2016 - Ethics and Information Technology 18 (1):33-39.
Four Challenges for a Theory of Informational Privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109–119.

View all 33 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-01-31

Total views
100 ( #115,564 of 2,499,084 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #89,671 of 2,499,084 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes