Authors
Lucas Introna
Lancaster University
Abstract
Algorithms, or rather algorithmic actions, are seen as problematic because they are inscrutable, automatic, and subsumed in the flow of daily practices. Yet, they are also seen to be playing an important role in organizing opportunities, enacting certain categories, and doing what David Lyon calls “social sorting.” Thus, there is a general concern that this increasingly prevalent mode of ordering and organizing should be governed more explicitly. Some have argued for more transparency and openness, others have argued for more democratic or value-centered design of such actors. In this article, we argue that governing practices—of, and through algorithmic actors—are best understood in terms of what Foucault calls governmentality. Governmentality allows us to consider the performative nature of these governing practices. They allow us to show how practice becomes problematized, how calculative practices are enacted as technologies of governance, how such calculative practices produce domains of knowledge and expertise, and finally, how such domains of knowledge become internalized in order to enact self-governing subjects. In other words, it allows us to show the mutually constitutive nature of problems, domains of knowledge, and subjectivities enacted through governing practices. In order to demonstrate this, we present attempts to govern academic writing with a specific focus on the algorithmic action of Turnitin.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1177/0162243915587360
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,256
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

We Have Never Been Modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Harvard University Press.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Ethical Implications and Accountability of Algorithms.Kirsten Martin - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 160 (4):835-850.
Who Gets to Choose? On the Socio-Algorithmic Construction of Choice.Dan M. Kotliar - 2021 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 46 (2):346-375.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Governance: The Art of Governing After Governmentality.Henrik Enroth - 2014 - European Journal of Social Theory 17 (1):60-76.
Governing and Calculating Everyday Dress.Ingrid Jeacle - 2012 - Foucault Studies 13:82-98.
The Ghost in the Legal Machine: Algorithmic Governmentality, Economy, and the Practice of Law.Adam Harkens - 2018 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 16 (1):16-31.
Participation for Free. Exploring (Limits of) Participatory Government.Kerlijn Quaghebeur - 2006 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 38 (4):497–511.
Governing as Governance.J. Kooiman - 2003 - Sage Publications.
Pastoral Power and Algorithmic Governmentality.Rosalind Cooper - 2020 - Theory, Culture and Society 37 (1):29-52.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-11-26

Total views
4 ( #1,216,213 of 2,419,621 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #191,887 of 2,419,621 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes