Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

PLoS Med 2 (8):e124 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Published research findings are sometimes refuted by subsequent evidence, says Ioannidis, with ensuing confusion and disappointment



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,377

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

New scepticism about science.Carrie Figdor - 2013 - Philosophers' Magazine 60 (1):51 - 56.
Empirical developments in retraction.B. K. Redman, H. N. Yarandi & J. F. Merz - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):807-809.
Responsible conduct in research.P. J. D. Drenth - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):13-21.


Added to PP

23 (#558,991)

6 months
2 (#520,889)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

A statistical paradox.D. V. Lindley - 1957 - Biometrika 44 (1/2):187-192.

Add more references