Sci-Phi: Are Copenhagen’s days numbered?

The Philosophers' Magazine 28:29-30 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Explaining emergence: Toward an ontology of levels. [REVIEW]Claus Emmeche, Simo Koppe & Frederick Stjernfelt - 1997 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28 (1):83-119.
Did Popper falsify Copenhagen?Mathew Iredale - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 32:27-28.
Sci-Phi: Did Popper falsify Copenhagen?Mathew Iredale - 2005 - The Philosophers' Magazine 32:27-28.
A critical note on the greatest days of quantum theory.Karl Popper - 1982 - Foundations of Physics 12 (10):971-976.
Pragmatism, Bohr, and the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.Reza Maleeh & Parisa Amani - 2013 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27 (4):353-367.
Reply to James Van Cleve. [REVIEW]Peter Unger - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (2):467-475.
Constructing the myth of the copenhagen interpretation.Kristian Camilleri - 2009 - Perspectives on Science 17 (1):pp. 26-57.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
14 (#930,021)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mathew Iredale
University College London (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references