Is Psychology Relevant to Aesthetics?

Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 56 (1) (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A symposium on Bence Nanay, Aesthetics as Philosophy of Art and Murray Smith, Film, Art, and the Third Culture. Commentaries on the two books by two critics, followed by responses by the two book authors.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aesthetics as Philosophy of Perception.Mette Kristine Hansen - 2017 - Philosophical Quarterly 67 (269):860-863.
The Macro and the Micro: Andreas Gursky's Aesthetics.Bence Nanay - 2012 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (1):91-100.
Philosophy of perception as a guide to aesthetics.Bence Nanay - 2014 - In Greg Currie, Aaron Meskin, Matthew Kieran & Jon Robson (eds.), Aesthetics and the Sciences of the Mind.
Aesthetics as Philosophy of Perception.Bence Nanay - 2016 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK.
Bence Nanay: Aesthetics as Philosophy of Perception. [REVIEW]John Kulvicki - 2016 - Times Literary Supplement 2016:October 21, 2016.
The Multimodal Experience of Art.Bence Nanay - 2012 - British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (4):353-363.
Psychology and aesthetics.C. A. Mace - 1962 - British Journal of Aesthetics 2 (1):3-16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-17

Downloads
65 (#236,337)

6 months
10 (#187,567)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Sherri Irvin
University of Oklahoma
Bence Nanay
University of Antwerp
Elisabeth Schellekens
Uppsala University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references