Is Psychology Relevant to Aesthetics?

Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 56 (1) (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A symposium on Bence Nanay, Aesthetics as Philosophy of Art (Oxford University Press, 2016) and Murray Smith, Film, Art, and the Third Culture (Oxford University Press, 2017). Commentaries on the two books by two critics, followed by responses by the two book authors.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,934

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Psychology Relevant to Aesthetics? A Symposium.Bence Nanay, Murray Smith, Sherri Irvin & Elisabeth Schellekens - 2020 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 56 (1):87.
Is psychology relevant to aesthetics?George Dickie - 1962 - Philosophical Review 71 (3):285-302.
The Nature of Aesthetic Experience and the Role of the Sciences in Aesthetic Theorizing.Sherri Irvin - 2019 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 56 (1):100-109.
Aesthetics as Philosophy of Perception.Mette Kristine Hansen - 2017 - Philosophical Quarterly 67 (269):860-863.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-17

Downloads
81 (#261,756)

6 months
3 (#1,499,762)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Murray Smith
University of Kent
Sherri Irvin
University of Oklahoma
Bence Nanay
University of Antwerp
1 more

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references