Russell's earliest interpretation of Cantorian set theory, 1896–1900

Philosophia Mathematica (1):1-31 (1987)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/philmat/s2-2.1.1
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,606
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Guest Editor's Introduction: JvH100. [REVIEW]Irving H. Anellis - 2012 - Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):249-267.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
On Russell's Vulnerability to Russell's Paradox.James Levine - 2001 - History and Philosophy of Logic 22 (4):207-231.
Russell's Early Theory of Denoting.David Bostock - 2009 - History and Philosophy of Logic 30 (1):49-67.
Cantorian Set Theory and Limitations of Size.Joseph W. Dauben - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (4):541-550.
Constructive Versus Ontological Construals of Cantorian Ordinals.Wolfram Hinzen - 2003 - History and Philosophy of Logic 24 (1):45-63.
Sets, Classes, and Categories.F. A. Muller - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):539-573.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-08-24

Total downloads

72 ( #72,820 of 2,168,588 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #127,318 of 2,168,588 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums