Bayle on the (Ir)rationality of Religious Belief

Philosophy Compass 8 (6):560-569 (2013)
Abstract
Bayle's conception of reason is notoriously difficult to unravel, as are its consequences for the rationality of religious belief. The secondary literature has generally coalesced around two interpretations of Bayle's conception of reason. The “superskeptical” interpretation holds that reason is the source of its own undoing, not to be trusted; religious belief turns out to be irrational on this conception of reason, but this is hardly cause for alarm. The jusqu'au bout (to the very end) interpretation holds that reason is to be followed wherever it leads, and if one follows closely, reason requires the rejection of religious belief. On both models, religious belief turns out to be irrational. In this piece, I summarize and examine these two interpretations, and using José Maia Neto's exposition of Bayle as an Academic skeptic, I propose a third that I call “common sense” skepticism. On this reading, reason does indeed use logic to form and sort beliefs – including some religious beliefs – but only holds to those beliefs fallibilistically. There may be a category of religious beliefs, however, that can only be recommended by faith; these would be religious beliefs that lack rational evidence, or exhibit rational contradictions. On this view, while some religious beliefs may turn out to be rational, there will likely be a set of core religious beliefs that come out to be irrational. I end by highlighting a suggestion by Bayle that reason itself may recommend revelation as a guide to belief, conferring a kind of intermediate rationality even on apparently irrational religious beliefs.
Keywords Pierre Bayle  religious belief  rationality  skepticism  moral belief  faith
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/phc3.12044
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,564
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Philosophical Writings of Descartes.René Descartes - 1984 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Amyraut on Reason and Religious Belief.Kristen Irwin - 2011 - Modern Schoolman 88 (3-4):191-200.
Swinburne and Plantinga on Internal Rationality.Alvin Plantinga - 2001 - Religious Studies 37 (3):357-358.
Pluralism and Justified Religious Belief.David Basinger - 1996 - Faith and Philosophy 13 (2):260-265.
Understanding Hume's Natural History of Religion.P. J. E. Kail - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (227):190–211.
Religious Beliefs and Aspect Seeing.N. K. Verbin - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (1):1-23.
Reasons and Religious Belief.Patrick Lee - 1989 - Faith and Philosophy 6 (1):19-34.
Added to PP index
2013-07-12

Total downloads
29 ( #203,184 of 2,235,837 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #193,221 of 2,235,837 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature