Essays in Philosophy 15 (1):77-85 (2014)

William Irwin
Kings College
There are some risks in producing public philosophy. We don’t want to misrepresent the work of philosophy or mislead readers into thinking they have learned all they need to know from a single, short book or article. The potential benefits, though, outweigh the risks. Public philosophy can disseminate important ideas and enhance appreciation for the difficult and complex work of philosophers. Popular writing is often less precise, lacking in fine detail and elaboration, but it can still be accurate . People often need a simplified account to get an initial understanding. Whatever one thinks of the role of jargon in scholarly writing, its place should be minimal in popular writing. If physicists can write books of popular science with virtually no equations, philosophers can write books for a general audience with limited jargon
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.7710/1526-0569.1490
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,231
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Against Intertextuality.William Irwin - 2004 - Philosophy and Literature 28 (2):227-242.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Reflections on Popular Culture and Philosophy.Alexander Christian - 2022 - Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy 35 (4):335-357.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
24 ( #475,853 of 2,518,236 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,236 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes