Deceived and distorted: game outcome retrospectively determines the reported time of action

Journal of Experimental Psychology 37 (5):1458-69 (2011)

Authors
Eve A. Isham
University of California at Davis
Abstract
Previous work suggested the association between intentionality and the reported time of action was exclusive, with intentionality as the primary facilitator to the mental time compression between the reported time of action and its effect (Haggard, Clark, & Kalogeras, 2002). In three experiments, we examined whether mental time compression could also be observed in an unintended action. Participants performed an externally cued key press task that elicited one of two possible tones. The reported time of action shifted closer to the tone when the tone was used to indicate the winner of a race (Exp.2) compared to when the tone was meaningless and did not indicate winning (Exp.1). This suggests that reported time of an unintended action could shift toward the effect in some contexts. Furthermore, the results from Exp.2 and Exp.3 (tones were substituted with verbal feedback) showed that a presumed winning action was judged to occur earlier whereas a presumed losing action was judged to be later. These findings therefore support the view that the reported time of action is reconstructed from known temporal information rather than determined by intentionality.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,410
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Rewarding Performance Feedback Alters Reported Time of Action.Eve A. Isham & Joy J. Geng - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1577-1585.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rewarding Performance Feedback Alters Reported Time of Action.Eve A. Isham & Joy J. Geng - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1577-1585.
The Time of Activity.Theodore R. Schatzki - 2006 - Continental Philosophy Review 39 (2):155-182.
The Representation of Time in Agency.Holly Andersen - 2013 - In Adrian Bardon & Heather Dyke (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Philosophy of Time. Wiley-Blackwell.
The Arrow of Time and the Action of the Mind at the Molecular Level.Jean E. Burns - 2006 - In Daniel P. Sheehan (ed.), Frontiers of Time. American Inst. Of Physics.
Time in Cognitive Development.Christoph Hoerl & Teresa McCormack - 2011 - In Craig Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 439-459.
Consciousness in Action.David Woodruff Smith - 1992 - Synthese 90 (1):119-43.
An American Tragedy" and "In Cold Blood.John J. McAleer - 1972 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 47 (4):569-586.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-11-21

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes