Synthesis Philosophica 26 (2):323-336 (2011)
AbstractDavid Hume thinks that human affections are naturally partial, while Francis Hutcheson holds that humans originally have disinterested benevolence. Michael Gill argues that Hume's moral theory succeeds over Hutcheson's because the former severs the link between explaining and justifying morality. According to Gill, Hutcheson is wrong to assume that our original nature should be the basis of morality. Gill's understanding of Hutcheson's theory does not fully represent it, since for Hutcheson self-love and self-interest under certain conditions are permissible, or even desirable or necessary for the good of society. There is not much difference between Hutcheson's and Hume's theories in the sense that they both extract impartial morality from human character as it is. Hume's theory does not succeed over Hutcheson's because Hume does not propose a better way of extracting morality nor explain all moral phenomena.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Similar books and articles
Virtue by Consensus: The Moral Philosophy of Hutcheson, Hume, and Adam Smith.V. Hope - 1989 - Oxford University Press.
The Metaphysical Morality of Francis Hutcheson: A Consideration of Hutcheson’s Critique of Moral Fitness Theory.Patricia Sheridan - 2007 - Sophia 46 (3):263-275.
Hutcheson's Divergence From Shaftesbury.Simon Grote - 2006 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 4 (2):159-172.
Hutcheson and Hume on Explaining the Nature of Morality: Why It Is Mistaken to Suppose Hume Ever Raised the "Is-Ought" Question.Marie A. Martin - 1991 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 8 (3):277 - 289.
Exciting Reasons and Moral Rationalism in Hutcheson's Illustrations Upon the Moral Sense.John J. Tilley - 2012 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (1):53-83.
Hutcheson's Relation to Stoicism in the Light of His Moral Psychology.Christian Maurer - 2010 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 8 (1):33-49.
Moral Phenomenology in Hutcheson and Hume.Michael B. Gill - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (4):pp. 569-594.
Religion in Hutcheson's Moral Philosophy.James A. Harris - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2):pp. 205-222.
References found in this work
Nature and Association in the Moral Theory of Francis Hutcheson.Michael B. Gill - 1995 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (3):281 - 301.
Citations of this work
No citations found.