Relativist 'know': 'wh'-complements and intermediate exhaustivity

Proceedings of ESSLLI (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We consider a puzzle in the question semantics literature. The puzzle concerns data when 'know' embeds interrogative complements. For the exhaustive strength in the literature known as intermediately exhaustive, first person ascriptions don't seem to exist, but third person do. By arguing against the only solution in the literature, we suggest that the puzzle is more interesting than previously thought. We provide a compositional semantics for 'know' where the interpretation of 'know' is relativized to an information state. The proposed semantics, we think, is compatible with relativism and nonindexical contextualism, but we opt for relativism for its relative ease in capturing disagreement data we provide.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Which judgments show weak exhaustivity? (And which don't?).B. R. George - 2013 - Natural Language Semantics 21 (4):401-427.
Questions with NPIs.Andreea C. Nicolae - 2015 - Natural Language Semantics 23 (1):21-76.
A Flexible Approach to Exhaustivity in Questions.Sigrid Beck & Hotze Rullmann - 1999 - Natural Language Semantics 7 (3):249-298.
Inquisitive Logic.Ivano Ciardelli & Floris Roelofsen - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (1):55-94.
Inquisitive Intuitionistic Logic.Wesley H. Holliday - 2020 - In Nicola Olivetti & Rineke Verbrugge (eds.), Advances in Modal Logic, Vol. 11. College Publications. pp. 329-348.
Exhaustivity as agreement: The case of Korean man 'only'.Youngjoo Lee - 2005 - Natural Language Semantics 13 (2):169-200.
Free choice, simplification, and Innocent Inclusion.Moshe E. Bar-Lev & Danny Fox - 2020 - Natural Language Semantics 28 (3):175-223.
Proof-Theoretic Semantics and Inquisitive Logic.Will Stafford - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 50 (5):1199-1229.
Support and Sets of Situations.Andrzej Wiśniewski - 2014 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23 (3):383-396.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-10-03

Downloads
319 (#59,283)

6 months
98 (#36,574)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ahmad Jabbar
Stanford University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Inquisitive Semantics.Ivano Ciardelli, Jeroen Groenendijk & Floris Roelofsen - 2018 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Edited by J. A. G. Groenendijk & Floris Roelofsen.
Epistemic Modals.Seth Yalcin - 2007 - Mind 116 (464):983-1026.
Index, context, and content.David K. Lewis - 1980 - In Stig Kanger & Sven Öhman (eds.), Philosophy and Grammar. Reidel. pp. 79-100.

View all 17 references / Add more references