Abstract
This paper provides an economic justification for the exemption from liability for omissions in torts and for the exceptions to this exemption. It interprets the differential treatment of acts and omissions under tort law as a proxy for a more fundamental distinction between harms caused by multiple injurers, where each one can single-handedly prevent the harm, and harms caused by a single injurer. Since the overall cost to which a group of injurers is exposed is constant, attributing liability to many injurers reduces the part each has to pay and, consequently, reduces each one’s incentives to take precautions. Broad exemption from liability for omissions is a way of carving a simple, practical rule to distinguish between the typical cases in which an agent can be easily selected and provided with sufficient incentives and cases in which there is a serious problem of dilution of liability. The exceptions to the rule exempting from liability for omissions are explained in terms of efficiency. The imposition of liability for omissions depends on the ability to identify a salient agent, i.e., to single out one or few liable agents and differentiate their role from that of others. Tort law designs three types of "salience rules." It either creates salience directly, or it can exploit salience created "naturally," or it can induce injurers to create salience voluntarily.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.2202/1565-3404.1055
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,489
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Uneasy Case of Multiple Injurers’ Liability.Shmuel Leshem & Ehud Guttel - 2014 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 15 (2):261-292.
Liability for Failing to Rescue.TheodoreM Benditt - 1982 - Law and Philosophy 1 (3):391 - 418.
Insanity as a Tort Defence.James Goudkamp - 2011 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31 (4):727-754.
Tort Liability Under Uncertainty.Ariel Porat & Alex Stein - 2001 - Oxford University Press UK.
Strict Joint and Several Liability and Justice.D. R. Cooley - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 47 (3):199-208.
Mens Rea in Tort Law.Cane Peter - 2000 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20 (4):533-556.
Acts and Omissions.Alexander Paul Donald - 1990 - Dissertation, University of St. Andrews (United Kingdom)

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-12-14

Total views
21 ( #537,621 of 2,520,891 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,891 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes