Elephants Who Marry Mice are Very Unusual: The Use of the Relative Pronoun Who with Nonhuman Animals
Society and Animals 14 (1):79-105 (2006)
AbstractThis paper explores the use of the relative pronoun with nonhuman animals. The paper looks at what dictionaries, an encyclopedia, grammars, publication manuals, newspapers, and news agencies say and do relative to this issue. In addition to investigating the views and practices of these authoritative publications, the study also searched a 100-million-word collection of spoken and written English. The study found that while some reference works reject or ignore the use of with nonhuman animals, other works discuss the possibility, and does occur in the corpus with nonhuman animals. Explanations for such usage include psychological closeness with particular nonhuman animals and/or features shared with humans. The paper suggests that the use of with nonhuman animals might play a role in promoting human attitudes and behaviors beneficial to fellow animals. However, it cautions that the correlation between language use, on the one hand, and attitudes and behaviors, on the other hand, is not a perfect one.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Language, Thought and Reality.Benjamin Lee Whorf, John B. Carroll & Stuart Chase - 1956 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 11 (4):695-695.
Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf.Benjamin Lee Whorf - 1956 - MIT Press.
As Charming as a Pig:The Discursive Construction of the Relationship Between Pigs and Humans.Arran Stibbe - 2003 - Society and Animals 11 (4):375-392.
Citations of this work
On Muzzles and Faces: The Semiotic Limits of Visage and Personhood.Massimo Leone - 2022 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 35 (4):1275-1298.
‘Eco This and Recycle That’: An Ecolinguistic Analysis of a Popular Digital Simulation Game.Robert Poole & Sydney Spangler - 2019 - Critical Discourse Studies 17 (3):344-357.
Similar books and articles
A Human-Animal Relational Aesthetic: Towards a Zoophilic Representation of Animals in Art. [REVIEW]Phillip Pahin & Alyx Macfadyen - 2013 - Biosemiotics 6 (2):231-243.
Human and Nonhuman Animals, Mutually at Risk: A Study of the Swiss Information Media.Annik Dubied Losa & Claudine Burton-Jeangros - 2011 - Society and Animals 19 (4):337-355.
Sexing the Rotifer: Reading Nonhuman Animals' Sex and Reproduction in 19th-Century Biology.K. Smilla Ebeling - 2011 - Society and Animals 19 (3):305-315.
Of Mice and Men: Revisiting the Relation of Nonhuman and Human Learning.Holger Schultheis & Harald Lachnit - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):224-225.
The Virtues of Hunting: A Reply to Jensen.Robert Lovering - 2006 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (1):68-76.
Contractualism and Our Duties to Nonhuman Animals.Matthew Talbert - 2006 - Environmental Ethics 28 (2):201-215.
Domain-Generality and the Relative Pronoun.José Luis Bermudez - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):676-677.
Vulnerable Subjects? The Case of Nonhuman Animals in Experimentation.Jane Johnson - 2013 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (4):497-504.
The Ethics of Extension: Philosophical Speculation on Nonhuman Animals.David Lulka - 2008 - Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (2):157 – 180.