Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism 25 (2):221-244 (2017)

Authors
Abstract
Western societies currently face the backlash of violent and militant extremisms practiced in the form of tribalistic-phobocratic politics. The battleground is set between advocates of self-centeredness and those who entertain a world-centered self. To entertain concerns what Henri Bergson calls “zones of indetermination” and assumes A. N. Whitehead’s dictum: “in the real world it is more important that a proposition be interesting than that it be true. The importance of truth is, that it adds to interest”. Cultural agencies, processes, and aims that we take an “interest” in have the power to be more influential, encouraging norms of persuasion. Such openness to the persuasion of entertainment is propositional in character, or acts as “lures for feeling” of proposals to be felt without mandates. The first section will discuss the way in which to take up the daunting task of reading Whitehead. The second and third sections will address those aspects pertinent to a philosophy of entertainment that present the cultural-aesthetic underpinnings for the emergence of persuasive agencies. The goal of cultivating tolerance and freedom for civilized societies hinges upon institutional methods and practices that are legitimated more by way of persuasive coercion rather than coercive persuasion.
Keywords entertainment  genetic/coordinate analysis  lures for feeling  persuasive agencies  transmedia  virtual integration
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1558/eph.34908
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,337
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

War is Persuasion.Harry B. Burke - 2009 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 21 (1):1-3.
Entertainment: A Question for Aesthetics.Richard Shusterman - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (3):289-307.
The Goals of Persuasion.Isabella Poggi - 2005 - Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (2):297-335.
Surveillance and Persuasion.Michael Nagenborg - 2014 - Ethics and Information Technology 16 (1):43-49.
Process Theism: Does a Persuasive God Coerce?Barry L. Whitney - 1979 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):133-143.
The Goals of Persuasion.Isabella Poggi - 2005 - Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (2):297-336.
Physical Agencies and the Divine Persuasion.Maud Bodkin - 1945 - Philosophy 20 (76):148 - 161.
Aid Agencies: The Epistemic Question.Keith Horton - 2011 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (1):29-43.
The Argumentative Structure of Persuasive Definitions.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2008 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (5):525-549.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-11-23

Total views
20 ( #558,126 of 2,507,886 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,507,886 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes