Authors
Bernard Jackson
University of Manchester
Abstract
The author has higher degrees in both Law and Iranian Studies, and here presents a comparison of the role of the judge (sometimes linked to ‘jurists’ or ‘legal scholars’, e.g., p. 2) in Islamic, Jewish and Zoroastrian traditions, including his relationship to experts in legal doctrine (here termed ‘Jurisprudence’) in the various traditions. His principal theoretical aim is to counter the categorisation of these legal traditions as “religious legal systems”, thus “giving the impression that it is religion which is their most important feature”.
Keywords Law  Religion  Judges  Jewish law  Iranian Law
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11196-014-9371-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,199
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Trust in(G) Eric.Bernard S. Jackson - 2013 - In A. C. De Oliveira (ed.), As interações sensíveis: Ensaios de sociossemiótica a partir da obra de Eric Landowski. São Paulo: Editions Estação das Letras e Cores e Editora CPS. pp. 81-100.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Legal Realism & Judicial Decision-Making.Vitalius Tumonis - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (4):1361-1382.
The Defensibility of Zoroastrian Dualism.John D. Kronen & Sandra Menssen - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (2):185-205.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-02-02

Total views
33 ( #347,732 of 2,518,142 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,142 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes