J.s. Mill and the diversity of utilitarianism

Philosophers' Imprint 3:1-18 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mill's famous proportionality statement of the Greatest Happiness Principle (GHP) is commonly taken to specify his own moral theory. And the discussion in which GHP is embedded -- Chapter 2 of Utilitarianism -- predominates the interpretation of Mill's normative philosophy. Largely because of these suppositions, Mill is traditionally read as a particular kind of utilitarian: a maximizing act-consequentialist. This paper argues that the canonical status accorded to Utilitarianism is belied by the text itself, as well as by its historical context, and that this point largely undermines the orthodox interpretation of Mill. In fact, GHP was intended as the statement of a common creed, acceptable to the diverse class of philosophers Mill counted as utilitarian. Moreover, the discussion of substantive moral theory in Utilitarianism in several respects does not reflect his own view, and the work itself is much less important than it is almost universally taken to be -- though not, it turns out, by Mill himself.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A comment on mill's argument for utilitarianism.Shia Moser - 1963 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 6 (1-4):308-318.
Mill on Happiness.S. Evan Kreider - 2010 - Philosophical Papers 39 (1):53-68.
Getting mill right.Deni Elliott - 2007 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22 (2-3):100 – 112.
Utilitarianism.John Stuart Mill - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
156 (#82,389)

6 months
5 (#154,227)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Jacobson
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Citations of this work

Hutcheson in the History of Rights.Stephen Darwall - 2022 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 20 (2):85-101.
Mill’s Moral Standard.Ben Eggleston - 2017 - In Christopher Macleod & Dale E. Miller (eds.), A Companion to Mill. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. pp. 358-373.
Mill’s moral theory: Ongoing revisionism.D. G. Brown - 2010 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (1):5-45.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

What is Mill's Principle of Utility?D. G. Brown - 1973 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):1-12.
Mill's act-utilitarianism.D. G. Brown - 1974 - Philosophical Quarterly 24 (94):67-68.
Utilitarianism.Henry Sidgwick - 2000 - Utilitas 12 (3):253.

Add more references