Philosophers' Imprint 3:1-18 (2003)

Daniel Jacobson
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Mill's famous proportionality statement of the Greatest Happiness Principle (GHP) is commonly taken to specify his own moral theory. And the discussion in which GHP is embedded -- Chapter 2 of Utilitarianism -- predominates the interpretation of Mill's normative philosophy. Largely because of these suppositions, Mill is traditionally read as a particular kind of utilitarian: a maximizing act-consequentialist. This paper argues that the canonical status accorded to Utilitarianism is belied by the text itself, as well as by its historical context, and that this point largely undermines the orthodox interpretation of Mill. In fact, GHP was intended as the statement of a common creed, acceptable to the diverse class of philosophers Mill counted as utilitarian. Moreover, the discussion of substantive moral theory in Utilitarianism in several respects does not reflect his own view, and the work itself is much less important than it is almost universally taken to be -- though not, it turns out, by Mill himself.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,784
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What is Mill's Principle of Utility?D. G. Brown - 1973 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):1-12.
Mill's Act-Utilitarianism.D. G. Brown - 1974 - Philosophical Quarterly 24 (94):67-68.
Utilitarianism.Henry Sidgwick - 2000 - Utilitas 12 (3):253.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Mill’s Moral Theory: Ongoing Revisionism.D. G. Brown - 2010 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (1):5-45.
Mill’s Moral Standard.Ben Eggleston - 2017 - In Christopher Macleod & Dale E. Miller (eds.), A Companion to Mill. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. pp. 358-373.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Comment on Mill's Argument for Utilitarianism.Shia Moser - 1963 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 6 (1-4):308-318.
Mill on Happiness.S. Evan Kreider - 2010 - Philosophical Papers 39 (1):53-68.
Getting Mill Right.Deni Elliott - 2007 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22 (2-3):100 – 112.
Utilitarianism.John Stuart Mill - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
147 ( #75,024 of 2,462,967 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #119,678 of 2,462,967 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes